The comparison effectiveness of integrated systematic- structrual method with - soloution focused with systematic- structrual on marital confilicts and boundaris and triangulation among couples in Isfahan

The aim of the research was to comparison the effectiveness of integrated systematic- constructive method with solution focusd with systematic- structrual on marital confilicts and boundaris and triangulation among couples in Isfahan. The research was quasi-experimental with pre test, post test and follow up with experimental and control groups design. The statistical population was all married and conflicted couples in Isfahan in 1998-99, from which samples of 30 couples were selected by convenience sampling and non-randomly were assigned in three groups experimental groups and one control group (ten couples in each group).The experimental group received 8 ninety minute sessions while control group was in waiting list. The measurements were marital confilicts scale (Sanaei, 2008) and Bounderis and triangulation scale (Dehghani & Yousefi, 2001). Gathered data was analyzed by descriptive (means and standard deviations) and inferential (repeated measure variance) statistics. The results showed the integrated method had significant effects on marital confilicts (F= 178.29, P< 0.01), triangulation (F= 5.162, P< 0.01) rigid boundaris (F= 38.40, P= 0.01) felexible boundaries (F=905.67, 0.01) and unrestriened boundareies (F= 202.15, P<0.01). The results of tuki Post hoc test showed the integrated method is more effective on improving marital confilicts, boundaries and triangulation among couples and pairwise comparison showed that the results were stable in the follow-up stage. As regard the results it can be said the systematic solution focused can be used to improve marital confilicts, triangulation and boundaries.