Implementation of ICJ Provisional Measures: An Innovative Approach to Article 78 of the Rules of the Court
According to Article 78 of the Rules of the International Court of Justice, the Court may request information from the parties on any matter connected with the implementation of any provisional measures it has indicated. While this provision makes it more likely that the provisional measures will be implemented, it is notable that it remains unexplored in the Court’s case-law. In the case relating to the “Alleged Violations of the Treaty of Amity”, the Court adopted an innovative approach and, contrary to its practice, exercised its power under Article 78 only a few months after it ordered the provisional measures. It thus requested the United States of America to notify the Court of any measures taken to execute the provisional measures within a maximum of 48 days. It is argued here that repetition and confirmation of this innovative approach in future cases will make it possible for the Court to act as a supervisory entity assuring the implementation of any provisional measures it has ordered.
-
The position of the concept of the doctrine of "responsibility to protect" in the principles and foundations of the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran with an emphasis on administrative law
Karim Mohammadi, Heybatolah Najandimanesh *, Soudeh Shamlou
Journal of Modern Research on Administrative Law, -
The Role of Prevention in The "Responsibility to Protect" Doctrine with emphasis on the Primary Responsibility of Governments
Karim Mohammadi, Hibatullah Nejandi Manesh *, Soudeh Shamlou
Journal of New achievements in public law, -
Identification of Elements of the Crime against Humanity of Deportation into the Situation in Bangladesh/Myanmar
*
Journal of International Criminal Law, Winter 2022