Validity of the decision of the General Assembly of the Administrative Justice Court in the judicial authorities and the General Assembly of the Supreme Court

Jurisdiction of the General Assembly of the Court of Administrative Justice is a unique jurisdiction to issue a decision in accordance with the law. This General Assembly, which can issue a vote on unity of procedure, a vote on creation of a procedure and a vote on annulment, has found a significant role and place in our legal system, especially in the sources of administrative law and legal uniformity in this field. Everything in this article is about the value of these votes in the judiciary; The authorities, together with the Court of Administrative Justice, are under the supervision of the Supreme Court, which monitors the proper implementation of the law in the courts and the uniformity of law enforcement in the country. On this basis, if a decision is issued by the General Assembly of the Court of Administrative Justice, especially the decision that is the unity of procedure and the establishment of procedure, the question arises what is its value in the judiciary. It seems that the decision of the General Assembly of the Court of Administrative Justice in the judiciary as a document and legal argument can be an effect that can create persuasion or not, but if this decision is in conflict with the opinion of the judiciary or the authorities Judiciary may invoke a conflict of opinion based on this judgment or a similar or different interpretation, although the reference law is not to resolve the conflict between the judgment of the judiciary and the General Assembly of the Court of Justice; the only authority that can resolve this conflict is the General Assembly. Is the country. This general assembly can end this dispute by issuing a unanimous vote. This result has been considered in several votes of unity of procedure of the Supreme Court in the form of an approach and solution of judicial procedure.