Notices the course of criminal proceeding in Iran and the United Kingdom: freedom or restriction of media(Investigating the Thalidomide case)

Press freedom comes from Citizens' right to information. But this Notices in criminal proceeding following the Corrupts sequences such as disclosure of confidential information, being under pressure by witnesses and jurors and judges & etc. So justified to create the legal restriction & prohibition. Both the criminal law of Iran and the United Kingdom, Are considered the Restrictions for press notices in criminal proceeding. The law of Iran has encountered only one legal ban on illegal recording and on illegal distribution in the form of crime. The law of England criminalized the both conducts for press. Illegal distribution criminalized with the aim of preventing the negative impact of the media and diverting the proceedings, Based on common law illegal distribution describe as crime with strict liability. But as a result of the Thalidomide case, The British Parliament to adhere to that principle, departed too much from strict liability rule by Ratification the contempt of court Act 1981. In total, Iranian press have more freedom in notices in criminal proceeding and confront less often restrictions. But UK procurement restrictions on press freedom are more coherent & accurately than the same in Iran legal system and leads to more responsibility for media.