Administrative corruption and its bottlenecks in the organizational and management structure studied in scientific and academic centers (administrative headquarters and applied scientific university centers)

Universities and scientific centers are known as one of the most important and influential and future-building sectors due to the cultivation of human resources, which is the largest and most important strategic capital of any organization that can bring many benefits to the organization at the world level. Therefore, it is natural to place a burden for the occurrence of corruption, but until now, due to various reasons such as complexity, specialization and technical as well as its non-ubiquity at the society level, the identification of corruption bottlenecks in the university complex from the point of view of criminal lawyers and criminologists is to a large extent The purpose of this research is to design a causal model of the occurrence of administrative corruption in scientific and academic centers as a theory underlying anti-corruption policies in scientific and academic centers. Administrative corruption in the scientific and academic centers of Tehran was obtained by examining the applied scientific universities of Tehran, the effective factors (individual and organizational) in the occurrence of administrative corruption in the scientific and academic centers of Tehran were identified and the impact of each factor on the tendency of employees to corruption They were checked administratively The results obtained from the research show that at the individual level, internal factors include "non-adherence to religion", "non-adherence to ethics and risk-taking" and "external individual factors (depending on the conditions) including material need" and "feeling of injustice". "Improper socialization and the level of communication with clients" play a role in the tendency to corruption, and at the organizational level, preventive factors include information and anti-corruption culture, "suitability of supervisory mechanisms and dealing with corruption, transparency and accountability." Factors that increase effectiveness include "unstable income", "use of information technology", "quality of decisions", "quality and manner of implementation of laws and regulations" and meritocracy play a role in the occurrence of corruption in scientific and academic centers.