Judgment Criticism from Procedural justice to Judicial Justice

Judgment is the most important output of a judicial system. It is the most valuable document and the most complete proof, reflecting the truth hidden in the case in question, especially if a decision is expressed in the form of a” judgment on the merits” on the case, decisively ends the dispute and expresses the judge's final opinion regarding the nature of the case (Article 299 of the Iranian Civil Procedure Code).This task has been given to the courts and it is the real mission and the main project of the Judiciary. Review of a judgment, delineating its strengths and sometimes its shortcomings and inadequacies, is the best assistance one can render the administration of justice.Based on this belief, I have gone to a judgment that is highly worthy of criticism. Non-existences, deficiencies, shortcomings and inadequacies are evident in this judgment.A Judgment that ends a dispute relying the efforts of multiple people through several original and ancillary claims, but fails in its main mission.In this short research, first the text of a judgment, then its writing inadequacies and substantive challenges are mentioned. In the midst of this discussion, the essential elements in making a magnificent, useful and worthy judgment shall be set forth.