Modern meritocracy in virtual states
Today, the issue of virtual states has been widely criticized. In domestic academic research texts, we have not yet reached the definition of the necessary standard and accurate analysis and critique of the virtual states. Unfortunately, not enough translated texts can be found from foreign legal and political analyzes at the domestic academic level. Not that it is not! Yes, but not enough. Finally, the concept of virtual states has been seriously challenged since states themselves became skeptical of their virtual achievements in exercising sovereignty in society. One of these superchallenges has been and is the discussion of the use and abuse of power and the very fragile position of the virtual government in connection with the discussion of the opposition of people's freedoms and national security. Virtual states needs a coherent and interconnected structure that has the four pillars of ethics, communication, economics and oneness in all its dimensions. The Global Green Village is a cohesive, prosperous, and ethical world driven by digital cameras, high-speed Internet, powerful processors, and regular software applications. Its enemies are malicious malware that is designed by the evil thoughts of information thieves and by affecting the functioning of all electronic devices of offices, banks, people, security and information systems, media, etc. first target the morals and identity of the people, then They pocket it and then destroy public safety systems. In this article, with a brief look at the changes that have taken place in the existing systems of governance that are advancing on the path of excellence and virtualization, we take a look at the position of modern meritocracy in virtual srares.
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.