Mechanisms for the participation of Amicus Curiae in the restoration of public rights

Public rights, including the social rights of the nation or universal personal rights, require the participation of non-governmental and popular actors to identify, explain, expand, demand and revive public rights as the main task of the judiciary in Article 156 of the Constitution and the Judiciary Transformation Plan. Is. In other words, the greater the public participation in identifying, demanding and monitoring the implementation and reform of norms, the more real and effective realization of public rights can be expected. Realizing this fact, the question of this article is "What are the mechanisms for the participation of court-friendly institutions in the restoration of public rights?" To answer this question, in order to identify the institutions of non-governmental participation related to the court, which are referred to as court-friendly institutions (Amicus Curiae), we discuss the role and mechanism of each participation in reviving public rights by descriptive-analytical method. These mechanisms, on the one hand, seek to promote and demand recognized rights and correct perceptions of existing and new rights in collective life through the reform and development of judicial procedures, and on the other hand, require the use of legal technology and the revision of laws in particular. It is involved in identifying and supporting court-friendly institutions. The research method in this article is descriptive-analytical and the comparative study approach has been used.