Typology of the use of independent reason in the critique of narrations

Suspicious narrative reports are refined by certain criteria such as the Qur'an, Sunnah, history, science, sense, experience, consensus, and definite intellect if they benefit from the accuracy of the informant. Among these criteria, the function of reason in the two spheres of instrumental role-playing and independent role is very colorful. The confusion between these two areas has caused the researchers of the theoretical sciences of hadith to consider the instrumental uses of reason in criteria such as presentation to the Qur'an, science and even literary sciences as components of reason-based critique of hadith. Stay open. On the other hand, the similarity of concepts such as science, sense and experience, custom, the construction of the wise, the biography of the rational and the biography of Muslims, has led to the identification of these concepts. One of the achievements of this article is the descriptive-analytical method of redefining the concept of the criterion of reason for criticizing hadith and explaining the difference between the function of reason in the two spheres. In the next step, the different types of intellect measurement in the critique of hadiths are separated from each other with logical definitions and appropriate hadith examples are provided in each article. These types are: the way of the wise, the building of the wise, the rule of the independent intellect, custom and logic. along with examples of hasty critique of hadiths with the measure of reason has been mentioned.