Criticism of the Arguments for the Ineffectiveness of the Rule of Presenting Hadith on the Quran

One of the methods of verifying the text of hadiths is to present them to the Holy Quran. This process, which is called “the rule of presenting hadiths to the Quran”, is based on various rational and narrative reasons. The most famous of these reasons are a group of traditions called “narrations of presenting”. Nevertheless, some objections have been raised to the correctness of this rule to the trend of Sunni and Shia appearance-centrism. The current research, using library sources and using the descriptive-analytical method seeks to reread these reasons, the extent of their meaning and answer to them. In this research, the problems of the opponents of the rule are divided into four categories: epistemological approaches, documentary problems, problems based on narrative evidence, and incorrect implications for the implementation of the presenting rule. In a general evaluation, the root of the aforementioned epistemological and content-based reasons goes back to issues such as understanding one side of some narrations, and lack of solid understanding of the concept of opposition in the context of wide-ranging narrations, and equating the concept of Sunnah with Hadith. The answers provided to the aforementioned problems are also based on the understanding of these issues. Documentary problems have also occurred due to focusing on a limited number of narrations presented, which are answered by referring to other hadiths and obtaining meaningful massiveness or abundance. The result is that none of the reasons can be used to harm the narration of presenting.