Critique of the production of architectural forms in the conscious process Based on the views of philosophers, architectural theorists and contemporary psychologists

The contemporary designer relies heavily on his position as an "artist". Individual language and personal interests prevent him from being able to properly organize the complex amount of information he encounters in the project and give a comprehensive plan based on it; He hides his incompetence behind the turmoil of an artistic figure. Another mainstay of the contemporary designer is the mere use of digital tools in the design process. Turning to digital development has practically separated the processes of human thought and imagination from their inherent connection with memory, body, imagination and the concept of "being" and the sense of "self". What is the way for the intellectual organization of designers has been researched in two types, which due to the qualitative method of the subject, the research is based on the method of comparative research.A) Examining the theories of the author-architects - those who have created valuable works and have written their intellectual foundations -. Most of these architects are also influenced by philosophers. The point of interest in his theories is to pay attention to and emphasize the "lived experience", the experience of the past and the present, is something that is hidden in the body of the designer as a container and is transformed from the mind to the body of architecture. Today, the author-architect not only considers the object to be meaningful in relation to its surroundings, but also that the object itself carries many meanings. The basis of the thinking of expert architects in connection with the "theory of architectural form" is very close to each other.B) The individual characteristics of the designer inadvertently affect the production of the form. Thus, in the next step, the authors find it helpful to recognize personality traits based on psychological issues in organizing the designers' intellectual turmoil and avoiding pure individualism. The architect, in his individual position, must know that human beings, as biological beings, They are the product of tens of millions of years of adaptation and gradual growth through continuous interaction with the real living world.Based on comparative comparisons of the theories of different psychologists, it is concluded that the designer can explore the strengths and weaknesses in different parts of his personality (including self, transcendence and institution, collective unconscious and personal unconscious, conscious and unconscious). Self, sad and happy experiences, emotions and ... Examine and adjust your personality traits; In order to strengthen its strengths and reduce its weaknesses. The more balanced the designer in terms of personality, the less his false excitement in producing the form and the more comprehensive and complete the response of the architectural form produced by him. Also, organizations and employers, according to their personality categories, can attract qualified people by taking psychological tests, which in itself requires additional extensive research. It is hoped that this research will be a source of inspiration for the continuation of such manpower organizations.