Criticism and classification of the opinions of critics of Shamlu's poetry and thought in the eighties and nineties

In this research, the articles that have been published in the last two decades on the subject of criticism and analysis of Shamlu's poetry and thought, which have been published in scientific-research magazines, have been examined and classified. and secondly, from what dimensions it has remained unknown and neglected. In this research, an attempt has been made to answer the question that the most critical approach of critics in the last two decades has been to which type of criticism has been applied to the criticism of Shamlu's poetry and what is the reason for the abundance or few types of criticism made on Shamlu's poetry and thought? For this purpose, a descriptive-analytical method has been used. The results of the research show that the number of criticisms in the 90s is twice as much as the criticisms made on Shamlu's poetry in the 80s. Out of the twenty-one articles in the eighties, eight were rhetorical criticism, four were constructive criticism, and the rest were mythological, psychoanalytical, and feminist criticism. In the nineties, forty-three scientific research articles criticized Shamlu's poetry and thought, which was the most Comparative, rhetorical, constructivist, and reader-oriented criticism respectively. The results of the research indicate that the frequency of comparative, rhetorical, structuralist, and constructive criticism in the criticisms of the last two decades shows that the critics, according to the latest approaches of criticism in the world and based on the view They are moving forward in the world of criticism. On the other hand, there are a lot of modern aspects in Shamlu's poetry, and the rhetoric of her poetry is western and new, and it is more compatible with modern literary theories, which has caused critics to have an exponential tendency towards her poetry.