A comparative study of the foundations and principles of freedom from the perspective of Islam and existentialism and its educational requirements

The purpose of this article was to study the comparative principles of freedom from the perspective of Islam and existentialism and its educational requirements. In terms of qualitative approach and in terms of analytical-comparative method, with reference to scientific documents, including articles and books of thinkers in the field of Islamic sciences and existentialism, which continued in the field of freedom in relation to education and training in a purposeful manner until reaching saturation. The results of the comparison showed that one of the common features of the two schools is the responsibility of freedom. However, the basic differences, including freedom, are the only human value and the inherent perfection of man, which is in conflict with the acceptance of Wajib-ul-Wujud (God) and other values. In the school of Islam, freedom is understood only by looking at man from a divine perspective, and any belonging is against freedom, but belonging and dependence on God Almighty considers belonging to God to be the same as freedom. Considering the absolute meaning of freedom, existentialists believe that the teacher He does not have the right to provide a definite solution to the student. The teacher is the only one who proposes solutions and topics, and it is the student who ultimately chooses or rejects the solutions. In contrast to Islam, despite the belief in the freedom of the teacher and support And your guidance makes them responsible for their decisions and subject to accountability and impeachment.