Jurisprudential Examination of the Evidence of "No Sexual Stimulation of Children" as a Jurisprudential rule

Tarbiya (proper upbringing), addressed by scholars from different dimensions, is one of the most complex and important skills in enabling human beings to achieve perfection. One of the most important and effective areas of education is sex education. The general rules of jurisprudence, which are based on verses and hadiths and can be applied to educational issues, can express the strategy needed in sexual education. Therefore, the present article aims to present a jurisprudential rule concerning the interaction between jurisprudence and sex education. The researcher is trying to answer the question as to how it is possible to derive the rule of "no sexual stimulation for children" from valid jurisprudential evidence.In the present article, some of the arguments associated with the rule mentioned above are examined by relying on an inferential methodology. It seems that it is possible to extract the principle of no sexual stimulation of children by examining the proofs of the prohibition of sexual intercourse in the presence of children, the narrations concerning the need to separate the bed of ten-year-old children, the narrations regarding the necessity of covering the private parts in front of children, the proofs of the necessity of covering the child's private parts, and the narrations concerning the prohibition of kissing a six-year-old female child.According to the aforementioned rule, it is forbidden for parents and educators to behave in a way that provides grounds for sexual stimulation in trainees in all of their educational actions that take place in front of children and trainees.