Dispute and indivisible verdict with an overview on Judicial precedent

Subject: Dispute and indivisible verdict with an overview on Judicial precedent Abstract: In the Iranian legal system, like any other legal system, a dispute has many varied divisions. Division of disputes could include financial and non-financial, in personam (Personal action) and in rem, ancillary and the main, intial and appeal and movable and immovable property disputes.Among other divisions, disputes are divided into divisible dispute and indivisible dispute, which in some cases overshadows other divisions as well. In Iranian Law, similar to French law, extension of dispute’s effect to a third party in an indivisible dispute is considered, but unlike the French law, the extension takes place upon issuance of the verdict, while in French law, extension’s effect would appear upon filing the claim and each of these two requires separate requirements. In other words, in Iranian law, there is a theory and hypothesis concerning extension of the effects upon issuance of the verdict to the persons against whom an indivisible claim has been filed. This is an issue that in French law raises the need for the presence of stakeholders in the proceedings. This research which has been conducted in the form of library and field (Review of some court verdicts) study, seeks to introduce such disputes with the aim of providing a practical and/or legislative solution to eliminate the resulted obstacles and problems together with the various interpretations that lead to adoption of various procedures.Keywords: Dispute, Verdict, Division, Extension, Profit