Evaluating the effects of good rural governance on the vitality of rural households (Case study of Zahedan villages)

Rural households due to many problems such as drought, floods and sometimes economic problems such as youth unemployment and poor health, their vitality is always subject to changes and developments that with proper management and good governance - these problems can be reduced and vitality. He gave gifts to the villagers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of good rural governance on the livelihood of rural households in Zahedan. This research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of nature and method of descriptive-analytical work, which is done in two ways: library study and field survey. The statistical population of the study consists of rural households in Zahedan city. Due to the dispersion of villages and their large number, 20 villages were randomly selected as the sample village. According to the 2016 census, these villages have a total of 4456 households equal to It had a population of 18,365, of which 354 were selected using the Cochran's formula. The Cronbach's alpha value is 0.80 for governance indices and 0.85 for vitality indices. Multivariate regression analysis and one-sample t-test were used to analyze the findings. The results showed that good rural governance with an average of 2.839 and the vitality of rural households with an average of 2.773 were lower than the desired situation. The study of the effects of good rural governance on the vitality of rural households showed that good rural governance has the greatest effect with a beta coefficient of 0.398 on the economic vitality variable and the lowest effect with a beta coefficient of 0.147 on the environmental vitality variable. Governance also affects the variables of social vitality and cultural vitality with beta coefficients of 0.321 and 0.256, respectively.