Comparative Study of Learning Strategies, Learning Styles and Study Approaches Amon High School Students Experimental, Mathematical, Human

The purpose of this study is a comparative study of learning strategies, learning styles and study approaches among high school students (experimental, mathematical, human). Aligudarz is done

The statistical sample consisted of 240 students from three groups (80 humanities, 80 experimental students, 80 mathematics students) were determined by the available method. The research tools were Pantridge et al.'s Motivational Strategies Questionnaire, the Club Learning Style Questionnaire, and the Martin and Seljo Study Approaches and Skills Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using t-test for independent groups and one-way and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA ANOVA) using SPSS software.  

The overall results showed that learning styles, learning strategies and study approaches are different among the volunteers of all three groups. The results of multivariate analysis of variance of group effects and learning strategies showed that the mental review group variable with 64.07% had the highest ETA square and the critical thinking group variable had the lowest ETA square with 0.1% and divergent group with 0.06 in learning styles. 77% highest and convergent group with 32% lowest ETA radar and variable depth approach group with 64% highest and variable approach group with 51% lowest

ETA radar and in fact study strategies, styles and approaches between groups independently and in pairs It was found that there was a difference.