The application of connective coherence in the analysis of conflicting cases of commentators of the Holy Quran

In the Holy Quran, the sentences are connected to each other by means of accessories that make the verses coherent. One of the factors that play a role in its beauty and discovering its subtleties and hidden layers is coherence and continuity. This issue is investigated and studied in the field of new linguistics under the title of textual coherence. In 1976, Halliday and Ruqieh Hassan called the semantic, verbal, syntactic and logical connection of text components "cohesion" and their overall coordination in the vertical axis "cohesion". One of the most important tools of cohesion is link cohesion. In this theory, conjunctions are mentioned as a separate element, next to grammatical and lexical elements, under the title of linking elements. In this research, we intend to investigate and analyze the disagreements of the commentators and Ibn Katheer in this verse based on the theory of link cohesion, using a descriptive-analytical method, and specify how to categorize and analyze the disagreements based on this theory. The findings show that the analysis of the conflicting cases in this verse based on the theory of coherence indicates that the belief and lack of belief in the role of semantic linking of the sentences after and then with the preceding one shows the factor of difference in such a way that their opinions can be matched or not. According to the theory of coherence, he categorized.