Reviewing and criticizing the laws prohibiting the restoration of dead lands and comparing them with jurisprudential texts

Reviewing and criticizing the laws prohibiting the restoration of dead lands and comparing them with jurisprudential textsAbstractAccording to jurisprudential sources, the ownership of mortal lands during the absence of the Imam belongs to the ruling position of the Islamic society, which according to the public interest should be made available to the public, and the continued ownership of these lands is until revival. However, the laws related to mortal lands, both before and after the revolution, are flawed and in some cases contradictory, which has led to the abuse of some institutions, and institutions, for example, in relation to a land using two laws, two different rulings in their favor. They export. The present study seeks to identify the conflicts of these laws by examining the most important laws in this field, and by examining the jurisprudential sources, considers the theory of Maliki individuals to be suitable for the proper use of mortal lands.