A comparative study of the distinction between government actions in the two legal systems of Iran and France

Since years ago, in the Iranian legal system, the actions of the state have been divided into two types of sovereignty and tenure, and many effects have been overlooked on this separation. However, such a distinction in the country of this type of separation (France), which was the source of this theory, has abandoned and has taken into account new criteria that is the result of the evolution of the concept of government practices to public service. This change was the result of the problems that stemmed from the separation of government actions to sovereignty and tenure. In this article, we seek to take a step forward in advancing the administrative order by presenting a new criterion for better recognition of government -government -to -decline. According to the country of origin, in France after this separation, the criterion of "public services" and "type of administrative activity", respectively. In other words, the authors in the process of conducting descriptive -analytical research suggests that the entry of a new criterion such as public services in the Iranian legal system is essential to organizing administrative actions and providing people with the opportunity to achieve their rights; The criterion of public service provides the judge with the tool to use the principles of public service theory to put administrative action in this area and to provide appropriate orders. This criterion not only strengthens the rule of law, but is a step towards protecting the rights of citizens.