The effect of Imam Fakhr Razi's theological method and Ayatollah Javadi Amoli's in acquiring the Quran word's meaning

Theoretical topics are the base of Vocabulary knowledge. Those topics include knowing the sources of Quranic vocabulary and dictionary books, derivation, synonyms, verbal and spiritual sharing, opposites, etc. Therefore, an interpreter with vocabulary knowledge is needed to discover the message's meaning. Understanding the words of divine verses is like pitting one part against whole. Understanding and acting on God's commands without understanding the words of God's verses is impossible. An important aspect of discovering the meaning and divine purpose of the Quran's verses is the vocabulary of its words.In order to discover the divine purpose of the verses, there are rules for the interpretation of commentators. Searching for the meaning of words is done by following their criteria. Those criteria are not the same for different commentators. In the current paper, we will compare two interpretations of Tasnim and Mufatih al-Ghaib (Al-Tafsir al-Kabir) to show how these criteria, along with other factors, lead the interpreter to a specific understanding of the Qur'anic vocabulary, so that the path of one commentator separates from another in one verse. Among the cases that their acceptance or rejection, involves in choosing the meaning of the words of the Qur'an are rules, the presence or absence of allusions, carrying the words of the Qur'an on the truth, etc.; But in general, all the rules are influenced by religion and the theological point of view of the commentator. The words "Ab," "Ihsan," "Gholf," "Mozabzabin," and "Khulud" were checked by doing a library search, the findings revealed that the theological perspectives of two commentators, Imam Fakhr Razi and Ayatollah Javadi Amoli, have an impact on the meaning of these words.