Civil liability arising from the concealment of drug harms in Iranian law with a view to British law

Failure to provide information or to provide a lot of information can be negative and deterrent; therefore, the necessity of providing information is very important, and information must be provided that they are necessary, and the drug without it becomes a dangerous commodity. In English law and consumer rights protection law, the manufacturer of the final product is usually the one who takes responsibility as the manufacturer. But the manufacturer of the defective component is responsible for the damage caused by the resulting defective product, as well as the person composing the material, is deemed by the manufacturer. In Iran's law, the responsibility for compensating the consumer is determined by the responsible authority of the person or legal person, whether private or public, which has caused the user to enter the damage and harm. This research uses a descriptive-analytic method to study the comparative study of civil liability caused by the actuarial disadvantages of drugs in Iranian law with a view to English law. The results show that the civil liability of Iran and the UK are apparently different. In England, unlike Iranian law, deliberately and unwittingly, they are two independent lawsuits for civil liability. Compensation for mistakes, misdemeanors and neglect the pharmacists' offices in the delivery of medicines are subject to the responsibility of the insurance professional of pharmacy and drag companies, according to the doctor's dossier. According to the Teshibod rule, pharmacists are known as guarantors for consumers and are responsible for compensating them for damages.