The scope of the rule of validity of the adjudicated matter in the final decisions (with emphasis on the settlement of the dispute)

Among the challenging issues regarding the validity of the adjudicated matter, regarding the possibility or impossibility of extending the rule to the final decisions; In particular, the lawsuit is expected to fall, which has caused confusion in the judicial courts and especially among the legal doctrines. This research is of theoretical type and the research method is descriptive-analytical and the method of data collection is library and has been done by referring to documents, books and articles.Ethical Considerations: In order to organize this research, while observing the authenticity of the texts, honesty and fidelity have been observed. In the law of civil procedure, finality is special for opinions that cannot be sued by normal means, and this is the same meaning that can be deduced from French law. The results of the upcoming research indicate that the rule of validity of the adjudged matter governs the opinions issued in the nature of the lawsuit and are conclusive. This is the reason why the judicial procedure does not include other final orders issued by the court as valid except for the decision to drop the case.