Pathology of lack of financial independence and operational budgeting system of the judicial system in restoring and guaranteeing public rights

In the direction of the pathology of the judicial system in the restoration and guarantee of public rights, this article has been written in a descriptive-surveillance method, and the data collection tool is the library and field method with a Delphi questionnaire. In this research, content (face) validity was used in the formulation of questionnaire questions and construct validity was used to examine the general relationships between factors and convergent and divergent validity, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to measure the reliability of the research instrument. The value of Cronbach's alpha obtained for the financial independence of the judiciary was 0.982, the acceptance rate was 0.995, the ability rate was 0.995, and the process rate was 0.992. One-sample t-test was used to analyze the data, and Friedman's test with spss software was used to rank operational budgeting factors. In order to test the overall structure of the conceptual model of the research, the structural equation test was used using pls software. The results of the T-Tech test showed that the financial independence of the judiciary does not exist at the moment. But regarding the implementation of operational budgeting, it is currently possible to implement it. Also, among the determined factors and selected components including 1- acceptance (legal-political-social) 2- ability (human-financial-technical-operational resources) 3-process (motivation-time-functional) acceptance factor for financial independence Judiciary does not have an operational budgeting approach in the Judiciary, but there is an ability factor and a process to implement this issue.