Examining the conditions and guaranteeing the implementation of the rule of confidentiality of arbitration in international trade

Today, the confidentiality or, conversely, the openness of commercial arbitration in recent years has become one of the most controversial issues in the legal forums and judicial procedures of the courts of different countries. One of the advantages of arbitration over court proceedings is its private nature and closure, which means that the litigants, unlike the litigants in their courts, choose the method and manner of resolving disputes, and in most cases they are arbitrators or The judges are selected and appointed to this task. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to investigate the confidentiality of arbitration and its necessity in international trade. The present study was conducted by descriptive-analytical method. There is a close and close relationship between the litigants and the members of the arbitral tribunal. For this reason, it is said that hearings and hearings of the jury are private and usually only those who have agreed to the litigation will be allowed to attend. The findings of the present study show that the confidentiality of arbitration is accepted as a principle in domestic and international courts in most countries. The denial of the obligation of confidentiality of arbitration by some governmental judicial authorities has caused some arbitration laws in different legal systems to explicitly state the implicit condition of confidentiality of arbitration. Failure to comply with this obligation by unauthorized committed persons may result in civil and criminal warranties, as the case may be.