Examining Robert Nozick's View of "Justice As Entitlement"

Robert Nozick's entitle theory of justice with the title "Justice as entitlement" is an individualistic, duty-oriented and right-oriented perspective. This view is based on the theory of natural rights. As an authoritarian thinker, Nozick presents his theory based on the above principles in three rules. He is against increasing the power of the government to the extent that it can redistribute property and assets based on certain patterns (for example, supporting the needy). This view is a reaction to Rawls's theory and any type of welfare state in the field of justice. This article examines the basics of the theory and the theory itself with a descriptive-analytical method in two parts. In addition to the basic problems, the problems in the theory include: ambiguity in the three rules, disregard for content justice, reduction of justice to the domain of ownership, incomplete explanation of ownership factors, ignoring public charity, ignoring the problems of the free market, freedom of slavery, incomplete explanation of the legitimacy of the tax, and failure to provide a solution for the withdrawal of assets from ownership.