The theory of generalization of the three pillars; The general rule of civil liability in Iranian law and Islamic jurisprudence

Theorizing in law has been necessary, customary and useful. Civil liability, which is considered to include errors, is also one of the legal institutions that needs to be theorized from the beginning and especially now. The answer to the question whether all forms of civil liability in Iranian law and Islamic jurisprudence have common elements or not? It can remove the veil from an innovative theory about civil responsibility in Iranian law and Islamic jurisprudence and reduce its theoretical and practical knots, especially in the field of education, as well as its distance from the civil responsibility laws of other countries. The present article has come up with a descriptive and analytical method as an answer to the aforementioned question and with new descriptions and analyzes of the three pillars of civil responsibility in a special sense, i.e. waste and attribution, it has been found and proven to exist in other types of responsibility as well, so that in the light of it , the conflict between the theory of unity and the plurality of civil responsibility should be reduced in favor of the theory of unity.