Investigating the cultural impact of alternative dispute resolution methods in reducing crime with an Islamic approach

While the agreements include several ethical systems, the perceived atmosphere is very important for most of the unions and the agreements approved in them and it affects the ethical behavior of investors, because sometimes in the way of implementing capital agreements We are facing many problems before the third governments and even among the members, which must be solved correctly and in the correct ethical and legal frameworks. After the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty and the extension of the Union's jurisdiction to the field of foreign investment, due to the conflict of investment agreements with the Union's regulations, the European Union faced many problems with third governments and even among the members. The union tried to solve its problems with third countries through a letter of approval and provided the basis for the continuation of their moral validity; But in the case of agreements between members, the emphasis of the union is mainly on the conclusion of these agreements. On the other hand, by referring disputes to international arbitration courts and issuing judgments of these courts based on international law and not on Union regulations, this caused the Union to protest. In fact, the European Court's approach based on the priority of Union rights over international laws will have an effect on the ability of investors to file lawsuits and follow the correct moral style in terms of pursuing their rights towards member states. Although even with the recent decision of the European Court, bilateral agreements will still be valid according to international law and arbitration courts can be formed based on them; However, it will cause a serious disruption in the implementation of the issued votes. The courts of the union members can consider this decision of the court in the form of an extended interpretation of public violation, disobey the right moral path and refuse to implement the decision and invalidate the arbitration decision, which is also contrary to the principle of good faith. It is towards foreign investors and it is far from moral dignity in the way of implementing laws.