An Analytical Approach to the Opinions of the Commentators in the Verse "Kullun ya`malu `alaa shakilatihi"

From the beginning until now, under the verse 84 of Surah Israa, the commentators have had several positions in explaining the meaning of "shakilatihi". Some have considered the verse to be unnecessary of interpretation, but most of the commentators have put forward meanings such as intention, disposition, habit, religion and denomination, essence and nature for "shakilah", but they have not given further explanation and only in the interpretations of the 14th century, they refer to the messages of religious beliefs and anthropological aspects and the anthropological aspects of "shakilah" have received little attention. Most of the public commentaries in the interpretation of "shakilah" are satisfied with the sayings of the predecessors and lack judgment and analysis, and if an explanation was given, their statement was vague. Like the rest of the commentaries, most of the Imamiyyah commentators have briefly ignored the verse until the end of the 14th century. In the 14th century, the first interpretation that paid enough attention to the importance of shakilah's discussion and removed the doubt of predestination from the sanctuary of the verse in detail, and had a serious impact on the thinking of commentators after it, is the commentary of al-Mizan; although this transformation has not taken any way to Ammeah exegetic works.