Reviewing and Criticizing Ayatollah Marafet's Opinion about the Rule of Jari Based on Hadiths

The Quran is an ever-flowing spring in the bed of time, whose thirst for truth and guidance has been quenched by its clarity, and it is still flowing and eternal in the passage of time. One of the most important secrets of the Qur'an's immortality is the adaptation and spreading of the contents of the verses to new examples in the passage of time. This action is referred to as "Jerry's rule" or "Jerry's and matching rule". Ayatollah Marafet believes that the current rule is different from the interpretation of the verse; therefore, it is important and necessary to review and criticize this view based on traditions. Therefore, in this research, with a descriptive-analytical method, we are trying to find the answer to this question, is the theory of Ayatollah Marafet based on the negation of the interpretation of Jari's rule consistent with the hadiths? In this regard, first, his point of view is presented and then using the traditions in which the interpretation of the Qur'an is described in examples that are beyond the reason and subject of the revelation of the verses, as well as the traditions in which the rule of Jari is used and it is specified that this act is the interpretation of the Qur'an, their claim was criticized and proved that implementation is one of the types of interpretation of the Qur'an.