Placemaking Based on the Continuity of the Value of Natural Areas

The reason for the lack of scientific researches in the field of positioning of natural areas and of course the necessity of combining these two areas to improve the level of positioning of natural areas is the need for a scientific method that can reanalyze and then compare and criticize and then evaluated the best results from the combination of fields in the studies. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the characteristics of the accumulated knowledge in the field of placemaking in terms of form, methodology and content.

Meta-analysis method was one of the tools needed to combine the tools needed to inform scientific decisions and policy-making, and on the other hand, it was a research study that systematically combined or integrated single-case results. It was used independently, using statistical methods to calculate a scientific work. The articles reviewed in this research were identified from the scientific database of Semantic Scholar in the period from 2018 to 2022. After reviewing and considering the quality of the output from the content point of view, 31 articles were reviewed and evaluated

There were more articles in the field of physical and human. The concept of placemaking based on the continuation of the value of natural areas referred to the preservation and sustainable exploitation of natural resources, biodiversity, and balance in ecosystems. Maintaining environmental balance, the economic value of these resources for income generation and employment, the social value of these areas for recreation and rest, and improving the quality of urban life and its environmental value were very valuable for preserving the environment of other creatures and protecting the natural environment.

There was a strong significant relationship between subject classification and theoretical approach. Place-making in nature has also a significant focus on the human-centered field, natural areas, sustainability and social health.