Legal pathology of the effects of handing over the investment company Social security (Shasta) to the private sector

What are the effects and consequences of handing over social security companies to the private sector on this institution from the point of view of legal aspects. In this article, the arguments of supporters and opponents have been examined and each one has been evaluated separately. The transfer of social security subsidiary companies to the private sector is an issue that has been raised by legislators for a long time, and this issue has supporters and opponents, which has been considered based on the capacities of the social security organization and the manner of these transfers. The implementation of the policies of Article 44 of the Constitution caused a lot of conflict between supporters and opponents in this category, and the purpose of this article is to investigate the damages caused by this handover. The research method in this research is descriptive-analytical based on library studies. The rise of Khusolti companies is one of the signs of failure in the privatization process. Also, the realization of the goal of increasing productivity after the privatization of economic enterprises is something that experts do not easily confirm. For this reason, there are concerns about Shasta's divestiture, especially regarding the eligibility of applicants to purchase companies on the divestiture list. Of course, so far there have been other problems in handing over Shasta, which have prevented its full implementation. In this case, points such as the effect of currency fluctuations on the transfer process of Shasta companies have been mentioned.