Explanation and Analysis of Obligation Concept in Kant's Ethical Theory
This article is an attempt to examine the concept of obligation in Kantian ethic from three viewpoints of semantics, epistemology and ontology. On the basis of semantics, obligationis an act one is required to do. Requirement, then, is the a necessity of a free act under the rule of reason. Epistemologically speaking, reason is the source of ethical rulesand obligations. Morel rules are a priori synthetic ones and categorical imperative is that by which one can recognize his own moral duties. Reason as Kant believed not lays down butdiscovers moral rules. Ontologically Kant held ethical realism. He lists different kinds of duties. In his view the categorical moral rules are not conditioned to any end and thus notsusceptible of any exception. There is no possibility of conflict among the moral obligations. Ethical theory of Kant is based on different epistemological, humanological, and axiological assumptions.
-
The Quiddity of ꜥUjb and Takabbur (Arrogance) from Ghazali’s Point of View
*, Mehrangiz Dadashi
Journal of Ethical Studies, -
Investigating the evolution of the principles of religion in the Mu'tazila language based on the semantics of the term "principles of religion".
Ali Vakili *, Hosein Atrak
Journal of Kalam Pajouhi,