A report on the double endeavor, double work and promotion of country's civil service safety" Conference and Exhibition (From 4 December 2010 to 9 December 2010)

In addition to practical activities to promote civil service safety and fight against corruption, one of the most important programs of “The Council of State Regulatory Agencies” is to held conferences and exhibitions to attract officials and Islamic state’s agents attention more than ever to the civil service safety and effective combat against corruption. In 1988, the council held a conference with the presence of senior officials and experts from universities and seminary. Efforts of researchers at the conference were published in a book entitled “Proceedings of the Conference on Promotion of Civil Service Safety” which was provided to the public. Given the relative success of this conference, the Council of State Regulatory Agencies decided due to the occasion of World Day to Combat Corruption and commemoration of double endeavor, double work, to hold a conference and exhibition on the performance of regulatory agencies and executive bodies in 1989.Presenting more than 170 scientific papers by experts, participation of officials and policy makers and the wide presence of audience, were the evidence of an enthusiastic welcome from practitioners and researchers of the field to the conference. Also, an exhibition was held of achievements, activities and programs of executive bodies in the field of promotion civil service safety; active bodies were introduced and a summary of their performance was presented by relevant authorities.This article is a summary of report on the ‘double endeavor, double work and promotion of civil service safety’ conference and exhibition to high, at the level of p≤0/05 and influential on good smuggling in Boushehr Province. Viewpoint of three groups (experts and officials, shopkeepers and traders, smugglers) about the performance of related organizations, effectiveness of existing laws to combat smuggling and tendency to use smuggled goods at the level of p≤0/05 are significant and different but their view about the impact of tariffs on smuggling are not significant and is the same at the level of p≤0/05.