![]() |
پشتیبانی: ۰۲۱۹۱۰۹۰۸۹۱ support@magiran.com |
تاریخ چاپ: ۱۴۰۴/۰۲/۰۳ |
این مقاله در «بانک اطلاعات نشریات کشور» به نشانی magiran.com/p2444759 نمایه شده است. برای مطالعه متن آن به سایت مراجعه کنید. |
ارزیابی توان زمین گردشگری ژئوسایت های منتخب منطقه سردشت در استان آذربایجان غربی | |
نویسنده(گان): | مریم رحمتی، جواد درویشی خاتونی، علی محمدی، سارا نری میسا، سیامک شرفی* |
چکیده: |
در این مقاله به مقایسه و ارزیابی ژیوسایت های شهرستان سردشت با استفاده از دو مدل بریلها و زوروس پرداخته شده است. با استناد بر روش های پیمانی، ارزش ژیومورفولوژیکی سایت ها با استفاده از شش معیار علمی- آموزشی، تنوع زمین شناختی، زیست محیطی و زیبایی شناختی، ارزش فرهنگی، خطرات بالقوه و نیازهای حفاظتی و پتانسیل برای استفاده (کاربری) موجود در روش زوروس و چهار معیار علمی، آموزشی، گردشگری بالقوه و خطر اضمحلال موجود در روش بریلها بررسی و مقایسه شده است. طی بررسی اولیه توسط کارشناسان خبره و افراد محلی، سه ژیوسایت از دایره ارزیابی با توجه به معیارهای گفته شده خارج و سپس تعداد ۱۵ پرسشنامه برای ارزیابی دو ژیوسایت اصلی و منتخب تهیه و توزیع شد. نتایج ارزیابی نشان داد در مدل بریلها بالاترین ارزش را شاخص خطر اضمحلال و پایین ترین ارزش را شاخص گردشگری به خود اختصاص داده است. از نظر درجه خطر اضمحلال، دو ژیوسایت مجموعه آبشار های سه گانه شلماش و مجموعه اشکال چشمه تراورتنی کانی برازان در وضعیت متوسط قرار دارد که اگر با مدیریت بهینه حفاظت نشوند در آینده ای نه چندان دور می توانند در وضعیت خطر بالای اضمحلال قرار بگیرند. نتیجه ارزیابی ژیومورفوسایت ها با مدل زوروس نشان داد کمترین امتیازات شاخص مربوط به عیار حفاظتی و زیست محیطی و بالاترین رتبه شاخص ها مربوط به عیار علمی است. لذا با توجه به نتایج این ارزیابی، از یک طرف بر ضرورت داشتن برنامه ای بلندمدت و اصولی در منطقه که بتواند امکان راه اندازی شبکه ای از فعالیت های نظارت و حراست از ژیومورفوسایت ها را فراهم کند و از طرفی ارتقاء هویت های محلی، ایجاد زیرساخت های گردشگری، توسعه محصولات و خدمات جدید محلی، ایجاد فرصت های جدید شغلی، تشویق رشد اقتصاد محلی و در نتیجه دستیابی به توسعه پایدار محلی را سبب شودتاکید می شود. |
کلیدواژگان: | توان گردشگری، ژئوسایت، مدل بریلها و زوروس، منطقه سردشت |
نوع مقاله: | مقاله پژوهشی/اصیل |
زبان: | فارسی |
انتشار در: | نشریه کواترنری ایران، پیاپی ۲۶ (پاییز و زمستان ۱۴۰۰) |
صفحات: | ۸۳۹ -۸۵۷ |
نسخه الکترونیکی: | متن این مقاله در سایت مگیران قابل مطالعه است. |
Tourism potential assessment of selected geomorphosites of Sardasht regionby comparing Brilha and Zouros models | |
Author(s): | Maryam Rahmati، Javad Darvishi Khatooni، Ali Mohammadi، Sara Narimisa، Siamak Sharafi* |
Abstract: |
Introduction
Geomorphosites are defined as Geomorphological landforms and processes that have acquired aesthetic, scientific, cultural- historical and social- economic values due to human perception of geological, geomorphological, historical and social factors. In recent decades, the vulnerability of the geoheritage that includes geological and geomorphological natural elements have been less considered in comparison with the biological and cultural heritage and thus its situation is constantly blurred in the conservation actions. The aim of this study is comparison of geotourism development potential of geomorphological sites in Sardasht region, based on education and tourism potential, through evaluation of them and providing appropriate solutions for protection and promoting of this place as a tourism destination. Study area with 45° 29′ E and 36° 13′ N is located in west Azerbaijan province, in the northwestern of Iran, which forms part of the Zagros folded mountains with trend northwest – southeast. Materials and Methods
For this research based on a documentary study, initial data were collected and classified that was related to the research literature (Brilha and Zouros model was selected based on geographic conditions and geotourism attractions of the region). Then the locations of 5 geomorphosites and their topographic and geological information were derived from 1:50000 topographic maps and 1:100000 geological maps and field work. Finally, after selecting 2 geomorphosites (travertine spring of Kanigaravan and Shalmash waterfall), based on inherent value and additional value, identity sheet was prepared for each of them. Then during the field observations, pictures were taken of each geomorphosites and their locations were marked using GPS device and their distributions were drawn in Arc GIS software. Then the evaluation of each criterion was done using special questionnaires for each model that had been completed and ranked by experts (experts in geomorphology, geology, environment, tourism management and natives).The evaluation of geomorphosites according to criteria proposed models; the total value is calculated following the formula:Zouros model:Geomorphosite value = Scientific + Geodiversity + Ecological & aesthetic + Cultural + Potential threats & protection needs + Potential for useBrilha model:Geomorphosite value = Scientific + Geotourism + Educational + Degradation risk /4 Results and Discussion
In Brilhs model, the highest value are the indicator of degradation risk and the lowest value is the tourism indicator. In terms of the degree of risk of degradation, both geosites are in a moderate position, which if not managed properly, they could be at high risk of degradation in the not-too-distant future. The lowest scores of geosites in Zouros model are indicators related to potential threats & protection needs and ecological & aesthetic. The low tourism value of travertine forms of Kanigravan spring is the according to the model due to the lack of residential infrastructure, security and more suitable access than the geosite of Shalmash waterfalls. The lowest indicator values are related to potential threats & protection needand ecological & aesthetic in Zouros model. The highest rank of the indicators is related to the scientific value. Assessment of geomorphosites using the Zouros model is shown that Shalmash triple waterfall collection with score of 83 the highest rank and travertine forms collection of Kanigaravan spring with score of 71.5 the lowest rank has allocate. Conclusion
It seems that the selected geomorphosites of Sardasht region have been less visited due to the high scientific score evaluated in the Zouros model and educational score in the Brilha model that it can be due to less recognition, weak scientific content by the international community and rarity at the national level. Due to the weakness of management actions to the geosites conservation of Sardasht region, educational programs should be provide for visitors, especially students for understanding the importance of the region’s geomorphosites and to further influence their insights on geological and geomorphological processes of the region. Programs such as identification of landform, based on global standard scientific methods to maintain the topography integrity and collection of rare samples to restoration and validity, assigning some geosites as geography lab (geomorphology), to a large and independent organization in the country, such as the ministry of science, research and technology. Initiatives schemes based on geomorphological sites assessment in this region sush as Brilha and Zouros model allow the local communities to gain experience and have had active participation in geoconservation and geoheritage management. |
Keywords: | Geomorphosite Assessment، Brilha، Zouros Models، Compare Models، Sardasht Region |
Article Type: | Research/Original Article |
Language: | Persian |
Published: | Quaternery journal of Iran, Volume:7 Issue: 26, 2022 |
Pages: | 839 -857 |
Full text: | PDF is available on the website. |