Near a century and half ago, prominent people came into existence and could take actions to defend Islam. But the only personality who could create a new pole of power in temporary world by fighting with two post world war two power poles was Imam Khomeini, the founder of Islamic Revolution Iran of course; formation of Islamic power pole has never meant supremacy or domination. On the contrary, Imam Khomeini inspired by great prophets way of life, continued his mission of freeing humanity from darkness, blackness and ruination to light and dignity. Current research is a mixed (qualitative-quantitative) one and aims to explain the role of Imam Khomeini in formation of Islamic power pole and to identity its strategies. The results show that strategies of Islamic power pole formation from Imam Khomeini's point of view includes belief and trust in God, unity and brotherhood, rejecting supremacy and domination, uncompromising enemy, commitment to Islamic culture, enduring hardships and problems, and forming the nucleus of resistance.

With the beginning of Iraq's military invasion, the management of the holy defense continued with Imam Khomeini's guidelines. He stated that the principle of defense against aggression is obedience to God's order and defense against this imposed war is the defense of pure Islam and an obligatory principle and a shari'a duty. The main question of the article is "How was the soft power campaign of the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran during the holy defense era?" The hypothesis of the article is that, while explaining the causes of war and the necessity of defense, he has formulated the basic slogans in the war of initiative and the components of the defense policy based on soft power. The main lines of Imam's policies, influenced by; "Imam's (RA) jurisprudential thought about Jihad in Islam", "Imam's (RA) historical experience of the behavior of the system of domination and arrogance in Islamic countries and Iran", "His understanding of Saddam Hussein and the Ba'ath system of Iraq" and "Statements and actions of Iraqis" against Iran after the victory of the Islamic Revolution. This research, with qualitative method, examines the defense policy of Imam (RA) against threats and defense against the attacker with the aim of confronting it in three components: "Imam Khomeini's (RA) jurisprudential thought about Jihad in Islam", "Imam Khomeini's historical experience" has recognized the behavior of the system of domination and arrogance in Islamic countries and Iran", "prominence of "holy defense" in order to "issue the values of the revolution".

Zionists know well that in Islamic ethics jihad is a defensive but not aggressive war; Muslims do not fight for the purpose of securing and violating the rights of non-Muslims; it is the struggle of Muslims to preserve the existence of the Islamic society and defend Islam. This article, based on the SWOT model, will show that the Muslim-Palestinian struggle against Islamic racism against rapes of the Zionist regime does not mean war, violence, and morality common in today's wars, but Palestinians, in any case, value moral values in accordance with religion. Islam is respected and the battlefield is considered as the stage of defending the legitimacy of the religion of Islam and its homeland; this paper seeks to analyze the matrices of the Arab Spring and the security of Muslim Palestinians in a comprehensive view of the efforts of the resistance movement and the Hamas movement based on Islamic morality To protect the security of the Palestinian people against the Zionist regime's national security doctrine T offer.

History of Islamandthe worldshows that Islam breathed the breath of life into the body of humanity and human societyis revived، but from the beginning there have always been enemies who were determined to destroy Islam or prevent its effectiveness. For this purpose،They Have presented copies of unrealistic Islam and distorted readings of Islam against trueIslam that is noted with common title «American Islam» in the works and thoughts of Imam Khomeini (RA). The task of defending of Islam demands to offerand identify features andcharacteristics ofauthenticIslam againstperverted Islam Using authentic sources as well as divine and revelation texts in order to clear deceptive plans and advertisingfor colonizers forpeople. The wise advice of Imam Khomeini is in accordance withpreciousversesof the Quran، searchlight and bright Light in this way. We have achieved a number of factors in light of theselightsources that Keeping withpolicy، employment of righteous tool،being transnational and regional، Stabilityand integrity، collectivity، totality، supportingthe oppressed، Hostility with arrogants or Impudents and etc are among them.

Opposing modernity is the term which represents the attempts by Muslim scholars in the early 20th century in challenging modernity and its resulting orientalist logic in a postcolonial condition. Through reversing the core ideas of orientalism under the guise of concepts such as 'the question of collapse and underdevelopment', 'the idealistic conception of progress and backwardness', and 'selective confrontation with the Western civilization', this discourse of modernity tries to adapt Islam to conditions of the mainstream logic and to defend the constructed 'authentic' with the aid of the 'modern'. Using discourse analysis framework and relying on the logic of reversed orientalism, this paper aims to read a part of this confrontation and to analyze its resulting discourse through comparative review of social thoughts of Nursi and Seyed Jamal. A critical review of these two scholars should shed light on how their theoretical attempts in defending Islam and its institutions against colonial invasion, have resulted in a reproduction of the colonial logic because of being caught in an orientalist trap.

Fadaiyan Islam, as a popular-religious movement in the early 1940s, entered the political and social activities of Iran in order to defend Islam and implement Islamic rules and took measures in order to establish an Islamic society and government in Iran. The present article tries to answer the following question: What civilizational necessities for the ideal Islamic government did Fadaiyan Islam consider in their theoretical and practical principles? The authors extracted and analyzed the civilizational necessities regarded by Fadaiyan and related issues to them by using content analysis method of the book Rahnemaye Haghayegh va Parvandehaye Bazjouei Fadaiyan Islam (published in the 4 volume collection of Fadaiyan Islam dar Ayeneh Asnad). The findings show that seeking Islam, unity of Islamic societies, supporting domestic production, creating jobs, seeking justice, fighting the manifestations of corruption and colonialism, propagating religious and national culture, and education are the most important necessities of establishing an Islamic civilization from the viewpoint of Fadaiyan Islam.

The Islamic awakening as an identity-seeking uprising with its civilizational approach in a framework of political Islam is now if effect. It aims to regain the high status of Islamic civilization. Political Islam is a discourse which focus on the concept of "Islamic government" and its main concern is restructuring Islamic society according to Islamic principles. The direct confrontation with western culture and civilization has provoked this discourse which aims at decentralizing liberal discourse at a global level and defending Islam against invasion of arrogant powers. The present paper studies the pivots of the confrontation in Islamic societies between the discourse of political Islam and that of secularism. The research which uses a descriptive–analytical method, is based on the available resources and concrete realities. The most important finding of this paper is that the challenge and conflicts between political Islam and the West has a civilizational nature and the West tries, through the promotion of secularism and secular systems in Islamic societies, to confront Islamic awakening.

War exists with human beings and merged with human lif. Throughout history, there have been many schools of thought that have tried to eliminate war or to curtail it. Some schools praised the war. Islam can not be indifferent to this important issue as a religion which is a comprehensive and complete plan for humanitarian life. The question of this article is: What is the purpose of Islam from war? and What is the purpose of other religions in the war. It seems that the difference between the view of Islam and other schools and religions is more in the purpose of the war. To measure this hypothesis, we try to compare the purpose of the war in Islam with other religions. Our research method will be a comparative method. The findings of the article are that Islam and other religions do not coincide in the ultimate goal of the war. Therefore, the difference in purpose also has different functions in how to fight. Key words: war, Islam, necessity of war, originality of war, Christianity, liberalism