A good reputation is a financial right. In Iranian law, a tenant who is entitled to a goodwill or goodwill can receive a boom in return, otherwise there is no support for his boom;Whereas in English law, the protection of good business reputation is not bound by the existence of any other entity such as goodwill or the right to acquire and the merchant can, in any case, claim goodwill in the event that his business has a place of business. Be it material or done online. the present thesis is intended to comparative study of English law and the tenant’s good reputation in Iranian law and to identify solutions in order to recognize the ways to evaluate good reputation, in addition, it is intended to propose a theory about the advocacy of the tenant’s good reputation, based on the tenant must leave the business unit at the end of the lease term, and good reputation cannot be used as a pretext for remaining in the place. if the landlord or the new tenant benefits from the former tenant’s good reputation, the former tenant has the right to demand recompense for his good reputation.

In Islamic juristic methodology (Ijtihād), opinions-prevalence (Shuhrah) serves multiple functions and therefore, evaluating such prevalence is of great importance. There are various aspects to the ijtihād of Ayatollah Boroujerdi including shuhrah. This article aims to outline the components and steps of ijtihād according to Ayatollah Boroujerdi's perspective, based on his works, the recounts of his students, and related sources. Notably, some of these components have been formally incorporated into the ijtihād of Shitte jurists for the first time. Additionally, the significance of shuhrah will be explored within the ijtihād framework and in relation to consensus (Ijmā), and the sayings of the Prophet (Hadīths). It is worthy of note that shuhrah may be preferred over ijmā in certain exigencies and circumstances, according to Boroujerdi.

After developing a local scale for measurement of customer base bank reputation, one specific model has developed for Iranian banking system and tested in Tehran. Nonfunctional perceived value and persuading word of mouth as antecedents and trust (system & institutional) as consequence are elements of the model. Method of study is (qualQUAN). Qualitative part of study consist of interviews with bank marketing experts and bank customers. Dimensions of bank reputation has explored through content analysis of interviews. In quantitative part of study a survey of sample size 436 of commercial retail banks has conducted. Sampling method is convenience. Analyze of data shows that customer base bank reputation construct consists three factors. Model test shows that nonfunctional perceived value has positive impact on bank reputation (γ=0/84, p

"Narrative reputation" is one of the topics in the science of the principles of jurisprudence. Scholars in this field have sometimes defined "narrative reputation" as the multiplicity of narrators, and sometimes as the multiplicity of narrations. According to one definition, "narrative reputation" is a hadith that is narrated by many narrators, of course, in such a way that their number does not reach tawator (mass transmission), and thus it causes the reputation of the narration. The title "narrative reputation" was not found in Sunni sources, but the term "famous narration" is used instead, which has the same meaning as "narrative reputation". In order to know the status of "narrative reputation" and its application among Islamic denominations, we conducted a descriptive-analytical research using library sources, which reached the conclusion that according to the consensus of the jurists of different denominations, "narrative reputation" is one of the preferences in accounts conflict. From the point of view of most Sunni jurists, famous narrations provide reassurance and their applications in the preference between conflicting accounts, in the conflict between accounts and deductive analogy, as well as in abrogation and specification are mentioned with differences.

One of the moral rights related to the personality of individuals is the right to fame. Legal systems have supported this right in different ways. One of these methods is applying the rules governing tortious liability and imposing compensation on the violators of this right. Based on this, in the American and English legal systems, they have used the format and title of "defamation". The question is what are the concept, basis, conditions and pillars of defamation? What types of defenses are recognized in these two legal systems? And is it possible to file tortious liability lawsuits due to defamation in Iranian law? The basis of this responsibility in English law is strict liability, and in American and Iranian law, it is based on fault. Also, its elements are: existence of defamatory statements, publication of statements, attribution to the victim and loss. In addition, the consent of the petitioner, the public interest, etc. are among the defamation defenses and factors that create a balance between the right to freedom of expression and the right to reputation in American and British law, which seems that only the public interest can be accepted as a defense in Iranian law. The mission of this article is to achieve the rules governing tortious liability caused by defamation in Iranian law with an analytical-descriptive approach and with a comparative look at the American and English legal systems.

This paper examines the difference between the fame in real versus virtual world, aiming to introduce and develop new methods of studying the net and analyzing the extent to which the media-effect theories are applicable in an age when new issues are being born and expanded in virtual atmosphere. Moreover, the paper tries to compare and contrast the ability of different media on creating individual fame. In order to do that, Google has been chosen as the basic tool for generating a list containing the most famous people who share a similar first name (i.e. Mohammad). Using Schulman and Lamport’s method for quantifying the fame, a coefficient named as fame index has been then calculated for any of the people whose names are mentioned in the list and the numbers have been compared with the data gathered through a survey which was set to examine their fame in the real world. In the next step, the findings have been explained by cultivation theory. The findings indicate that the fame index and its ranking are significantly different in real and virtual atmosphere and different types of media have different capacities for promoting fame. In the other words, this shows that there is a difference between “what and who people want to know about” and “what and who people actually know about.”

Corporate reputation is stakeholders overall assessment of company over time. The Corporate reputation could affect company's financial performance where company's financial performance could affect corporate reputation. Accordingly, it can explain relationship between these behaviors where relationship between the two can be considered. Therefore, in this study, the correlation between corporate reputation and financial performance is examined. For this purpose, 64 samples of listed companies on the Stock Exchange during the period of 2011-2015 were selected. Using simultaneous equations (3SLS) the interaction between them has studied. Results show that the corporate reputation and financial performance has positive interaction. The findings could be useful for investors, managers and other users to establish the relationship between corporate reputation and financial performance.

Over the last several decades, corporate reputation has gained increasing importance for both managers and academics. Research on corporate reputation has generally argued that reputational risk, or risk of reputation loss, stems from all company risks. When a risk drives a firm into a crisis, some stakeholders' interests may go unsatisfied, and the firm's corporate reputation may be eroded. The more effective the enterprise risk management system is, the fewer crises a company will face and the less risk there will be to lose its corporate reputation.The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the quality of enterprise risk management system and the characteristics of the audit committee on the reputation of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. The statistical population of the study is the companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, of which 100 companies were selected as a sample. The results of Tobit regression model test showed that the quality of enterprise risk management system and the characteristics of the audit committee have a significant effect on the reputation of the companies under study.

Since accounting conservatism affects the company's financial reports, it plays an important role in evaluating the company's commitment to shareholders and subsequently the company's reputation. On the other hand, companies with a strong reputation have more concerns to protect their reputation. Therefore, seems to be a reciprocal relationship between corporate reputation and accounting conservatism. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between company reputation and accounting conservatism. In order to achieve the goal of the research, a sample of 123 companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period of 2016 to 2023, equivalent to 984 company-years, was analyzed using regression analysis based on combined data. The findings of this study show that the use of conservative accounting procedures leads to the improvement of the company's reputation. Also, the findings indicate that corporate reputation positively affects conservatism. In addition to the development of literature, these findings can be of interest to company managers, analysts and investors.

Fame-seeking is regarded as one of the most basic emotions for all people to do important measures. As an instance, becoming a hero is based upon fame-seeking emotion that given human`s lack of it, there would be no any other motive for doing action. This emotin has included all societies to such an extent that good cases have been replaced by bad cases and make any judging in the field difficult. The paper studies Muslim scholars` views in the field and answers questions pertaining to it. It describes the way for judging fame-seeking, separates good cases from bad ones and refers to some cases not able to be judged.