There are two views which relate to the reasonable basis of wisemen. Some believe the basis of wisemen is a reason when innocent people accept it. On this basis, we should prove that the basis of wise men relates to the innocent people's acceptance. But others believe there is no need to their acceptance.Because they think the basis of wisemen is based on reasonable social nature and they know it according to continuous principle. other point of wise men's reasonable basis is world wide fame. Can we find a place for it? How can we recognize the relationship btw the basis of wisemen and global behaviour. Since, there is a case that the wise men are wise, we can prove the reasonable basis of wisemen. Hence, it means the community esteem and global acceptance according to the behavioural- reasonable prinicple and thus wecan explain legal a behavioral superfluity.

The prosecutor of the International Criminal Court acts independently in carrying out his/her functions. S/he is responsible for investigation and prosecution of crimes within the jurisdiction of the court. If the prosecutor concludes that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation, s/he shall submit to the Pre-Trial Chamber a request for authorization of an investigation, together with any supporting material collected. If the Pre- Trial Chamber, upon examination of the request and the supporting material, considers that there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation, and that the case appears to fall within the jurisdiction of the Court, it shall authorize the commencement of the investigation. Functions and powers of the Pre-Trial Chamber provided for in the statute of the ICC gives the Pre-Trial Chamber the authority for permanent Survey on the prosecutor's functions and powers.

The Marmara ship situation, the subject of an attack by the Israel military on the ICC, referred to by the flag state has been rejected and archived by the ICC Prosecutor. This action of the prosecutor is in the light of the requirements set forth in Article 53 of the Statute, which must identify the rationale for the situation referred. If the prosecutor finds a reasonable basis, he/she will start an investigation, otherwise will file it. From this point of view, it is important to study the dimensions of the prosecutor’s approach in the judicial procedure regarding the condition of the Marmara ship. The research method in this paper is descriptive-analytical and critical. The main question of the research is what is the achievement of the judicial procedure based on the legal mechanism in forcing the prosecutor to reconsider the status of the Marmara ship referred by the flag state against the Israel regime? The findings show that the prosecutor's response to the situation referred by the flag state believes that there is no criterion for the severity of the crime, while the Comoros state believes that the Israeli military's attacks on the flag ship and its crew are enough severity that to be prosecuted in the ICC. Accordingly, the ICC’s judges found that the prosecutor's assessment of the lack of a reasonable basis was inconsistent with the circumstances of the situation. The prosecutor was asked to reconsider his previous decision. However, the judicial procedure has shown that the prosecutor obligation lacks a guarantee of performance and achievement and does not mean that a preliminary investigation into the criminal situation has been started. This implies the ineffectiveness of Article 53(3)(a) of the Statute and the referring State right to object for the prosecution of international crimes in the ICC.

Childhood hypertension has been extensively focused on in the past decades because of its increasing incidence, which is related to physicians’ awareness and the increasing number of obese children. Age, gender, and body size are the main determinants of blood pressure in children. The revised childhood blood pressure tables of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program are a prerequisite for classification of childhood hypertension. Although these tables provide a reasonable basis, they are intricate and height percentile is needed for final diagnosis. Many attempts have been done to decrease such complexity. We present new formulas that are concise and memorable, and will help physicians to screen prehypertensive and hypertensive pediatric patients.

Following the usual dichotomy in law, criminal law can be categorized under the title of public law. This classification must reasonably be followed by some particular subsequences and advantages as well as being rooted in a reasonable basis – including the repercussion of publicness in criminal law. There are two particular characteristics governing on public law: first the principle of incompetence of public authorities and the necessity of the competence being nominated case by case; and the second, the requirement of precise clarification of mechanisms and procedures of applying public authority. The criminal law being a sub-section of public law must reduplicate both characteristics in compliance with which its rules and regulations should be interpreted. The present article is an attempt to represent and explain these qualifications.

In the Statute of ICC, several criteria have been stipulated that the process of examination of any case requires their verification. These criteria establish limitations on the prosecutor and pre-trial chambers in order to fulfill ideals and purposes of establishment of ICC that is addressing the most serious international crimes. These criteria have been established based on reasonableness; there should exist a reasonable basis or ground so that suspected person be introduced before the prosecutor or be summoned to the pre-trial chamber. A legitimate expectation of ICC procedure reasonableness requires clarification of the challenging concept of the reasonableness. The objective of this study is to investigate these criteria in view of the concept of reasonableness, from initiation of the preliminary examination to confirmation of charges of the suspected person before the pre-trial chamber. This article concluded that if legal concepts contained in the Statute of the ICC are not clear, it probably leads to different interpretations and the issuance of contradictory verdicts which in turn challenges the credibility of ICC.

The main purpose of the establishment of the International Criminal Court is to investigate and prosecute international perpetrators of crimes, so that these individuals are not left without bureaucracy. To accomplish this, the Prosecutor of the Court has a tremendous duty. Selection of the situation and initiation of its research and its initial review is done according to reports, documents, evidence and evidence. At this stage, the prosecutor must establish a reasonable basis, in which case the primary branch will decide by conducting its own judicial oversight of conducting comprehensive investigations and prosecuting perpetrators.
The study seeks to analyze the initiation of international prosecutor investigations. To this end, some research-related issues will be evaluated in the light of the provisions of the Statute of the Court and its practical procedures.

Importance of soul entity, incorporeality and its end in all religions lead philosophers to pursue reasonable bases for them. The perfection of the soul after death is one of these religious issues that received increased attention among philosophers. Among all Muslim philosophers who rely on their philosophical foundations, Shaik -al - Rais' Abu Ali Ibn Sina (Avicenna) has paid special attention to the questions about soul and its perfection. Thus, the present article investigates the philosophical foundations and views of this great Islamic thinker about the issue of perfection of the soul after death. In other words, I seek to study whether Avicenna`s philosophy can answer the question of perfection of the soul after death or not. To address the question, I review the possibility of perfection in the afterlife and then explain his views about the perfection of the soul after death. Finally, I conclude that he did not have a clear answer to this question but some important points could be found in his works that lead us to have a better understanding of the issue.

In the doctrine of Mahdism, which is a religious doctrine and belief centered on the Mahdist culture, should the characteristics of spirituality be addressed with a rational perspective in discussions of Mahdism? Because spirituality should be formed on a scientific and reasonable basis, and the valuation of human behavior, as well as faith and belief, will only bring happiness and peace if its foundation is formed by certain rational and scientific principles. Therefore, this article, using a library method, seeks to explain spirituality based on reason in detail, as well as the relationship between spirituality and rationality and the characteristics of rational spirituality in the doctrine of Mahdism. And while referring to the perfection of reason as the most important achievement of the era of revelation, it ultimately comes to the explanation that rational spirituality, which is always in the light of the guidance of revelation; It is in accordance with human nature, in accordance with the Muhammadan law, in accordance with monotheistic ethics and moderation. As a result, rational spirituality based on the doctrine of Mahdism, with the connection of rationality and spirituality arising from the text of the law, will lead us to a humanistic, not a anthropocentric, life of goodness, with unique characteristics.

Freedom of the media guarantees the right to freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers. However, it is frequently challenged and restricted due to government action. In this research, a descriptive-analytical method has been used to study media censorship as opposed to media freedom by emphasizing media activities in the United States. The question is how to distinguish the prohibition of censorship from the imposition of legitimate restrictions. It is proven that in a democratic society, the media enjoys rights and freedoms but it also has duties and responsibilities. Concepts such as national security, defamation, war, hate speech, and obscene content are considered reasonable basis upon which media freedom can be restricted. In determining media restrictions, the principle is freedom of the media and limitations should be interpreted strictly. Despite the fact that Congress is prohibited from limiting freedom of expression under the First Amendment to the US Constitution, both the federal and state legislators, as well as the US Supreme Court, have sought to impose reasonable restrictions on the media by setting precise criteria. In conclusion, restrictions on freedom of the media in the United States are precisely defined, and such restrictions make the media responsible.