نشریه سیاست پژوهی ایرانی
سال ششم شماره 3 (پیاپی 21، پاییز 1398)

The purpose of the present study is to investigate and identify the political, ideological roots, motivations, and motives of the Houthi movement that has emerged in Yemen in recent years. In this study, the scientific and theoretical reasons of the Houthi movement have been taken into consideration by Dokmajian theory, and the role of Zaydieh and the actions of Yemeni rulers, especially Ali Abdullah Saleh and the ideas of Hussein Al Houthi have been noticed. This paper, using a descriptive-analytical method, shows that in analyzing the causes of the Houthi movement, some internal factors such as political, social, cultural and economic conditions are considered to be a factor for this movement and some other theorists believe external factors, international system and the effects of external events have contributed to this movement. The dynamics of the Houthi movement indicate that it will gain an important place in the political future of Yemen and in power position. Studying the intellectual roots of this movement has mostly political and ideological backgrounds that have fed the will of its followers. Combating oppression, American hegemony, Zionist influence, and the destruction of secularism have a particular place in these ideas, and they emphasize the legitimacy of the political system, justice and the renunciation of evil.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the factors mitigating the Afghan security crisis and the strengthening of Iran's relations with Afghanistan. The research was conducted using inferential analysis in the framework of descriptive and analytical method. The results show that in Afghanistan, a complex and multilayered combination of economic factors, socio-religious structures, and political and legitimacy factors has triggered a security crisis. Iran can adopt an economic and cultural approach to relations with the countries of the region to strategically align with Afghanistan and maintain its security environment while avoiding disagreements, cultural differences and economic needs of the two sides. In fact, at this point in time, Iran needs a great deal of forethought, rational planning and diplomatic skill to achieve the degree it deserves, and its exceptional advantages in the region. Iran must first seek to regionalize existing security measures. Paying attention to isolated national security on the one hand and the imposition of international security measures on the other hand does not guarantee Iran's national security and sometimes even threatens it.

The present paper seeks to answer the fundamental question of what are the philosophical implications of the "doctrine of difference" in John Rawls's theory of justice, and which doctrine draws the desired society? The methodology of this paper is analytical and descriptive, and the results show that the "doctrine of difference" in Rawls's theory of justice seeks to create the grounds for fundamental and equal liberty for all citizens, in a manner consistent with the realities of modern life. Rawls, therefore, conceives of humanity as an end in itself, preferring the right to the first priority in the status quo and seeking to create a coherent society based on accepting the principles of difference and plurality among all human beings. A desirable society commensurate with the doctrine of difference is a society based on the principles of liberal democracy, a market economy, and a welfare state in which human beings as citizens are treated politically with respect to the fundamentals of difference, and respect and respect one another's opinions.

The  purpose of this research is to describe and declare the social personality of Nasser-Al-Din-Shah-Qajar and It's impact on his policies by analyzing the content of diaries from his trips and with considering the Maslow's theory. In this regard, the items such as variety-seeking, fascination, fright of western countries, isolation, justice, features of women and sensuality of the king, attention to the disciplines and principles, king's despotism and collective wisdom, king's regret from Amirkabir's murder and his belief in transcendental issues have been discussed through this research. The results showed that, Nasser-Al-Din-Shah, due to the deficiencies and problems which had affected his personality, has paid more attention to the deceptive appearances of western countries and grandeur of the west in the sight of this king, cast a shadow over the king's travelogues.

The purpose of the present study is to investigate and present appropriate mechanisms for effective implementation of privatization policy in a fair and productive distribution of opportunities and resources. The results showed that in countries with weak institutions such as Iran, privatization through outsourcing has run counter to the constitutional goals of achieving economic justice and has led to unfair allocation of resources between different strata.  It seems that The gradual privatization by improving the business environment, strengthening the co-operative sector and transferring part of the state-owned enterprises to large co-operative corporations and subsidiaries in the sector, have prevented the accumulation of wealth in the long run and by few Public participation has led to the natural growth of the private sector and the pursuit of stable economic justice. The research method was qualitative and descriptive-analytical method.

The growing proliferation of UN-oriented international organizations and their role in shaping human life has led the international community to witness new horizons in international law, one of the most important doctrines presented in The new horizons of international law are the doctrine of the responsibility of support, a doctrine that has become a special place in the development of a universal normality today in the theoretical discussions of international law thinkers, which, given the importance of the subject in this The paper, while addressing the fundamentals and features of the doctrine of responsibility for support Opponents point of view and understand the meaning of it, the doctrine of responsibility to protect the fundamental question of how to operate Square has been achieved? Research findings suggest that although the doctrine has already been cited in crises such as the Darfur crisis, Libya, and even Tsunami Haiti and today in Syria, however, political restrictions are, in fact, the subject of the intervention of great powers and recourse to this doctrine to interfere with the pretext of human rights in other countries and undermine the principle of independence and sovereignty and regional instability.