نشریه اندیشه سیاسی در اسلام
پیاپی 19 (بهار 1398)

ISIS is a new phenomenon in Syria and Iraq and some other countries.like african countries .Their thoughts and performance have a left lot of confusions. ISIS has several aspects. In this paper, among the aspects of phenomena, discourse, state, ideology, and thought, has put it on the agenda. To understand the thoughts that form the foundations of their behavior, we use a prior information about Wahhabism. ISIS and Wahhabism have been compared in three ways: political opinions, political ethics, and political behavior, and the similarities between ISIS and Wahhabism's proximity and orientation have been identified. The method of collecting and studing is library information and documentary resources and qualitative content analysis method have been used for data analysis. Among the similarities of the two takfiri currents are the principle of emigration, their non-excommunication, and the superficiality of appearance and appearance. The two groups are rational and unrational.one of their common and important ideas are takfir.

An Exploration of Ayatollah Beheshti’s Political Viewpoints Based on Springers’s Method Abstract An Exploration of Ayatollah Beheshti’s Political Viewpoints Based on Springers’s Method Abstract The following enquiry aims at analyzing Beheshti’s political viewpoints using Springer’s method, this research aims at answering the question of the evolvement of Beheshti’s political standpoint. Findings of the research show his political viewpoints to be rooted in his understanding of his then-contemporary world crises. From his point of view, “idolatrous sovereignty” was the urgent crisis in the contemporary world. He believed tyranny, the prevalence of materialistic and non-religious thoughts, and subjection to be the causes of idolatrous sovereignty.” Nation- leadership” system, traced as utopia by Beheshti, would have been achieved by establishing guardianship of the Islamic jurist, forming committed cadre, institutionalization, freedom propagating and social justice fulfilling. Keywords: the crisis, idolatrous sovereignty, freedom, guardian ship of the Islamic jurists, nation- leadership system, institution. nation- leadership system, institution.

The failure of structural adjustment programs in the 1980s led to the design of a new theory of politics and government, one of which is the theory of good governance. This style, which emphasizes components such as transparency, corruption, efficiency, participation, accountability, the rule of law and the existence of an independent and efficient judicial system, has quickly emerged as a successful model of governance in global politics. At the same time as designing this view, we are witnessing the victory of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, a revolution that has come to the fore with the idea of ​​a monotheistic wisdom and justice. It seems that this synchronization has many reciprocal effects on the idea of ​​good governance, and the pattern of government emerging from the Islamic Revolution has also added other components of the elements involved in good governance. Imam Khomeini's monotheistic attitude and ontology as a leader and founder of the Islamic Revolution has had a great influence on the reading of a republican Islamic republic from a good government perspective.This research used the descriptive analytical method and also used the statements of the late leader of the Islamic Revolution to answer this question; According to Imam Khomeini's views, what is the idea of good governance and what influence does it have on the effectiveness of the political system? It seems that good governance in the eyes of Imam Khomeini is a model of governance that provides both the happiness of the people of the world and their bliss in the future. Hence, good governance is an attempt to establish an efficient, participatory, accountable, and fair-minded system.

The ambiguity of the research is that despite of the hegemony of Islamic Hijab since mid-1358 Hijri, In particular, by removing the discourse of secularism (and the idea of its notion of Hijab), and the hegemony of the discourse of Islamism (as the only existing discourse that could dominate its notion of Hijab without rival), since the 1360 Hijri, the issue of Hijab have still been exist. The question is that: "How and why was the issue of Hijab created in the Islamic Republic of Iran?" The present study, by using a descriptive-analytical method, has tested the hypothesis that “the issue of Hijab has resulted in the different readings of the subdivisions of Islamist discourse (the discourses of war, Sazandegi State`s Discourse, reformism, and Principlism) that based on their discursive space from the notion of Islamic hijab ( The extent of the Hijab (maximal and minimal Hijab) and the d

what is the question of the position of the opposition in the system of caliphate, and what rights do they have?The findings of this paper show that in the system of caliphate,the ideological,political,and political-ideological opposition can be identified.The most important opponents of the ideology are the disbelievers and the apostates.Dafi disciples have civil, social and political rights, although they are not equal in civil, social, and political terms with the Muslim majority, the apostates are deprived of all civil, social and political rights.The most important political-ideological opponents are the Gardens.Provided that they do not stand up for the caliphate system, they have basic social and civil rights, provided they are at the same level as the caliphate,on par with the ideological dissent. political dissenters lack political rights. The most important political opponents are Mohareb.The hostages are deprived of all civil, social and political rights because they are a fundamental threat to the political system and engage in violent acts of armed resistance, and they have no place in the system of caliphate.