فصلنامه بازی جنگ
پیاپی 5 (زمستان 1398)

Decision-making is the result of the commander's vision of "action," and the role and role of war play out as part of the analysis in support of military decision making. The purpose of the present study is to explain the role of war play in enhancing the decision-making power of the armed forces commanders. The researcher seeks to answer this question: What is the role of the war game in enhancing the decision-making power of the armed forces commanders? Given the nature of the subject, the research was applied because of the achievements of those commanders, the designers of the armed forces. The research method is descriptive. The researcher collects data in two ways: field, library and self-portrait based on years of experience teaching specialized courses, staff planning, and designing and performing maneuvers of war, classical, unbalanced, priestly, and water. ا Ground is in the Ajay Command and Staff University. The research concludes that the game of war plays a decisive role in enhancing the decision-making power of the armed forces commanders. And it's a powerful tool that helps militaries, designers, and commanders use two methods - one analyzing their own and enemy's workflows based on desired components and characteristics, the other by formulating complex scenarios with nested issues. Promote the martial arts, the art of fighting, the ability to predict, the power of analysis and decision-making.

Security is one of the key parameters in any society that will have a direct impact on the process of that society. In most areas of security, security resources are limited for protection and full security. One way to solve this problem is to use game theory. Game theory provides a logical way to allocate security resources to enemy targets. The aim of this article is to examine security games, their importance, modeling, solving and application in defense decision making and decision making in an uncertain environment. In this article, security games between a defender and several attackers are examined and the utilities of the players and how they are calculated are described. Due to the uncertainty in the presentation of payoffs by experts, the utilities are considered as interval. The game is modeled as a multi-objective optimization problem with interval-valued objective functions. There are several ways to solve this problem. A practical example of this type of game is the creation of security at the air border, and the model of this issue has been studied as a multi-objective security game. Finally, it can be concluded that many complex military problems can be explored using security games and an optimal solution model can be designed.

If defensive decisions are classified in terms of the type of defense, they can be divided into two categories: passive defense and active defense. The researchers' goal of active defense in this study is preventive attack. In fact, this type of defense seeks to implement the famous phrase "the best defense is attack." In some articles it is referred to as preventive attack. Passive defense means reacting to enemy attacks after being attacked using both active and passive defense approaches. In fact, in passive defense, he must stay in the defensive shell and react to the enemy’s operations. The attacker will similarly seek to balance his or her assigned resources in two areas, attack and self-defense, against a Preventive attack.The Defender makes his or her decisions to take preventive attack based on the estimated probability of being attacked. In both cases, whether or not a preventive attack is taken, the defender considers the worst-case scenario of the attacker. In this article, in addition to expanding the above concepts, we analyze the effect of the ratio between the sources of the parties and the tendency to attack and examine the strategies of both parties.