نشریه امامت پژوهی
پیاپی 25 (بهار و تابستان 1398)

There are several hadiths signifying the instant acquiring of the knowledge of the past and the present affairs by any of the Infallible Imams, hence accepted as an axiom. Incompatibility of multiplicity of the Infallible Imams’ knowledge with the contents of such hadiths on the one hand, and that such hadiths used to be thought to be not too many in number on the other hand have led to their justification. The present paper attempts to prove that such hadiths are not few in number, hence a plenty of such hadiths that prove their multiplicity have been discovered concerning the Infallible Imam’s knowledge such that the basis and nature of his knowledge are regarded as his escalating knowledge. Other types of the Infallible Imam’s knowledge prove his imamate. When apparently incompatible, they must be interpreted in the context and light of the multiplicity of his knowledge. Apparent incompatibilities of such hadiths can be solved by means of restricting their semantic and temporal scopes as well as regarding them as a different type of hadith(s), hence proofs in favor of multiplicity of the Infallible Imam’s knowledge count as their additional proofs.

The present Jouesh explains the strategies of Imam Ali (as) to confront the political and social projections of his opponents. After the prophethood, the Prophet (pbuh) covered the dispersal of the Islamic community. At this time, power was increased, the reference of the religious effort was replaced by the real patterns, and the rulers tried to change the lines of thought to suit the people, and by applying various methods such as: stimulating feelings, divination, divisiveness And ..... tried to persuade people and weaken the position of Imam Ali (AS) in society.The present study by descriptive-analytical method with a narrative-historical approach and an interdisciplinary study, while analyzing the underlying backgrounds of narrative, explores the diffuse methods of the opponents and ultimately explains the strategies of Imam Ali (pbuh) in the face of projections. The present study shows that preventive methods, and defensive strategies are visible in the life of Imam Ali (AS). The main method of defending Imam Ali (as) is discourse and reasoning in confrontation with the projection of his age, which is the most famous of his sermons and letters.The result is that Imam Ali (AS) used preventive methods such as enlightenment, disclosure and ... simultaneously with the discourse, writing and sermon, and for a moment they defended their rights. The analysis of Imam Ali's series (AS) in dealing with the projection of opponents can be a practical model for using and applying in the present era.

Ghadir's sermon was one of the most important speeches of the Prophet (peace be upon him), spoken by a large Muslim population in the year 10 A.H, and contains important messages about Islam and its main pillars, such as Imamate and Velayat. To examine this sermon, which is reported in three different quotes, and to obtain the full content of the Prophet's training, it is necessary to use text-based and credible interdisciplinary research methods to accurately parse texts and draw a general pattern of the text. In this paper, we attempt to analyze each of the three texts reported as a sermon separately, using the content analysis method, and then draw a geometric structure of each of these texts using the "content analysis" technique. Research findings show that these three reports, despite slight differences, share many similarities with each other and emphasize specific and consistent themes and categories. The results of the research provide the capability to integrate the geometrical structure of these three sermons. Therefore, the authenticity and validity of all three sermons are proven.

Divine divine prophecy is for the guidance and guidance of humans, which have two types of prophetic and prophetic, and both of them have been terminated. Shiite Imamate believes that after Imamate, Imamate is the successor to prophecy with the establishment of divine guidance and guidance to the people. The belief in the existence of Imamate after Khatmatyh has led to the alleged "violation of Khatmaty"; the proof of the difference between Prophethood and Imamate can eliminate this doubt; hence the question arises as to whether Prophethood and Imamate are in function and The mission is different or different, the leading issue is that with the library tool and the method of data analysis and evaluation, the comparative study of the work of these two divine offices is addressed. The result shows that Prophecy is the main propaganda of its work, propagating the past of the past, consolidating the sovereignty of the prophet of the Shari'ah and providing the way, but Imamate is also responsible for the fulfillment of the divine orders, the formation of a religious government and the penetration of the mankind in the direction of the evolutionary guidance. .

The present paper attempts to deal with studying the imamate-oriented views of the Iranian Salafist trend which is a revisionist current in the Shiite thought and its being identical with the main Twelver Shiite creed. The paper deals with a number of aspects of the problem, that is, definition of imamate, the major and minor qualifications of the Infallible Imam, and the process of making of imamate from their perspective. Having defined five key terms from the lexicon of the terminologies Twelver Shiism uses for and in the case of imamate, it shows the reasons for the opposition of the Salafist trend with these concepts. As for the main attributes of imamate, this paper deals with the rejection of the principle of the Divine selection and nomination, the knowledge and infallibility of the Infallible Imams, and their (i.e., Salafists’) skepticism over the primacy of Imam Ali over the other three caliphs who were contemporary with him. As for the minor characteristics, responsibilities, and offices of the Infallible Imams, the trend in question has cast certain doubts, too. They do so to make use of the Quran and the human intellect as their supports. They finally come up with rejecting the Divine nomination and the absence of any explicit text on the succession of the Infallible Imams. Therefore, the present paper attempts to render a well-documented report of these constitutive elements in the array of the beliefs of their Salafist trend so as to picture their correspondence with as well as their opposition against the mainstream of the Twelver Shiite doctrines

Etan Kohlberg, the Shi‘a study researcher in Hebru University has an article titled “Abu Turab” in which he studies the title of Imam Ali (A.S.) given by prophet (A.S). He in this article argues that the title Abu Turab was given to Imam Ali (A.S.) not out of honoring him rather, prophet wanted to diminish Ali. Nevertheless, Shi‘a scholars during the history have changed the origin of issuing this title from blame to admiration. Therefore, they have forged many hadith regarding this title. The present Article first present a Persian translation of Kohlberg’s paper then critically studies the main points of the writer. This article argues that first of all Kohlberg has not present the complete origins of this title and secondly the admiration origins are not restricted in Shi‘a sources. The methodology of this article is historical and analytical. We have referred in this article to abundant historical and hadith sources.