دانشنامه علوم قرآن و حدیث
پیاپی 13 (بهار و تابستان 1399)

In the view of Quranic scholars and commentators, comprehensiveness is one of the most important principles of Quranic interpretation and each commentator has a different position on this issue. In total, three general views, minimum, moderate and maximum, have been presented for comprehensiveness, and the arguments of each group need to be carefully examined. Abolfotuh Razi, the commentator of Rawd al-Jannan, is one of the commentators who has expressed thoughtful opinions in the following verses related to comprehensiveness. Accordingly, his view of the scope in question is the acceptance of a minimalist view, that is, merely the guiding aspect of the Qur’an. Among the explanatory arguments regarding his opinion and outlook about the minimum comprehensiveness that express his vision and thinking in this field, is the adherence of comprehensiveness verses to being guided and also the attribution of maximum comprehensiveness to the protected tablet, which focuses on the interpretation of “book” to “protected tablet” is considered in these verses. Examining the above opinions in a descriptive-analytical way confirms that factors such as not criteria for all narrations under the verses of comprehensiveness and also disregard for principles such as non-restriction and emergence (non-interpretation “and ... leading to the presentation of the above opinions It has been minimized by this commentator and other supporters of the comprehensive view.

In the book of Sufism and Mystism, Mr. Vakili divides Sufism into positive and negative and states the twenty characteristics and differences between the two. However, considering the works of Sufi sheikhs, they assume their personal discovery and intuition as a criterion and measure, and if a rational argument is made to refute their findings, they do not accept it, and also do not adhere to a particular religion and instead believe in the theory of personal unity. In the interpretations of the Qur’an, the appearance of the word is considered irrelevant to the claimed meaning, and in this way, they do not shy away from slandering the jurists and orders contrary to the Shari’a, distancing themselves from the infallibles, exaggerating the dignity of individuals, and even using superficialities to advance their goals.

Fadak, from past to present, with the strategy of Hazrat Fatima (peace be upon her), has been a tool to defend the guardianship (Velayah) of Amir al- Mo’menin (peace be upon him), therefore, it has always been attacked by many doubts; One of these cases is the reasons for not demanding Fadak during the rule of Imam Ali (pbuh), which has led to the statement by the Shiite opposition that Imam (pbuh) did not claim a right from the garden of Fadak. In response to this doubt, it should be known that the act of God’s authority has different dimensions that human beings are deprived of a comprehensive understanding of. Understanding the main reason for Fadak’s demand and actions such as tearing up its document and the reactions of the people in the face of the reforms of the Amir al-Mu’minin (pbuh) against heresies (innovations), helps us to get a true picture of the conditions of that time. On the other hand, in the actions of the Ahl al-Bayt (as), the forgiveness of personal rights due to public interests has also been mentioned as one of the cases of this decision.

Two promises of God to man; are language and thought that, if well known and used, play an important role in human excellence. By studying the relationship between the two and the effect of each on the other, we will know the advantages and disadvantages of these two abilities. Many psychologists and linguists have offered their views on this issue. Among Islamic scholars, the issue of the effect of language on Qur’an-centered thinking has been addressed. But the two-way relationship between language and thought has been less seen. In the bilateral study of these two, each of them was first recognized in the presence of the Qur’an. Then, the principle of the existence of this relationship and then the effect of thinking on language and the effect of language on thinking were considered separately, taking into account the Qur’anic reasons. In the end, it became clear that not only language and thinking are related, but also thinking directly affects language and language also affects thinking. But the main point in this discussion is that God’s view is based on the principle that language and thought should be used together and simultaneously, especially in the recitation of the Qur’an, to facilitate the attainment of the sublime goal of well-being.

Feasibility study of the two-way influence between writings can be important in identifying the history of thought and the dominant discourse space on readers in the field of thought. Narrative books are no exception to this rule and are included in this drawing space. In this paper, as a case study on the interactive influence of narrative books, considering the importance of the subject of the history of the Prophets research, this measure of influence has been traced specifically in two Books with a focus on the stories of the prophets. For this purpose, the section “Kitāb al-nobowwat of Bihār al-Anwār” (including volumes 11-14) and “al-Nour al-Mobin” in two approach readings, including the author- centered and text-based approach, are comparatively evaluated. Highlighting the relationship between the teacher and the disciple between Allameh Majlesi and Muhaddeth Jaza’eri, as well as the Jaza’eri scientific assistance to his master, is the main characteristic of the author-centered approach, so that cooperation in writing on some problem hadiths and solving some of the materials of writing can be identified as his assistance in strengthening Bihār al-Anwār. In the text-based approach, the similarities and differences between the two books are considered and the interactive influence and two sides of the two books are depicted.

A large volume of Atrat narrations is devoted to the issue of the behavior of believers in the age of the apocalypse. Among the narrations of the Infallibles, the hadiths of Mahdism related to Imam Kazim have another aspect; what is more, among the sects and schools of thought during the Imamate of Imam Kazim, the issue of false claimants of Mahdism was rooted in Islamic society, so that the Abbasids used this opportunity to try to confiscate the concept of “savior” and “Mahdism” in their favor’ and in this regard, they made efforts such as fabricating the hadiths of Mahdism and assigning a savior for the benefit of their family. In such circumstances, Imam Kazim, while enlightening, provided teachings to the Shiites in the direction of apocalyptic education With the aim of examining three narrations of Imam Kazim’s Mahdism hadiths on the subject of Shiite behavior in the apocalypse, this study tries to examine the document and text of these narrations by using hadith knowledge