جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « تفکر سیستمی » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

Trust and risk are the most important factors affecting individual behavior in the social networking platform. Individual behaviors on social media are divided into three general types: acceptance behavior, sharing behavior, and buying behavior. The Impact of Trust and Risk on Individual Behaviors There are many complexities and complexities in social networking platforms. We need a dynamic model to understand how each of the variables affect trust and risk on individual behaviors. In this article, first, using the results of previous research and surveys, trust and risk were identified as the most important factors affecting individual behaviors in social networks. In the next step, using the system dynamics approach, causal diagrams between effective variables were modeled. The relationship between the identified variables was extracted according to the paired comparison questionnaire and previous research. Dynamic model of the effect of trust and risk on individual behaviors in social networks, in three subsystems: the effect of trust and risk on individual behaviors with emphasis on employee behavior, the effect of trust and risk on individual behaviors with emphasis on user interaction, and the effect of trust and risk on individual behaviors It was designed with emphasis on the skills and competencies of the providers.

Strategic thinking is not just an alternative to what's under strategic management umbrella، But rather a special method of thinking with certain characteristics and recognizable.)Mintzberg, 2009: 65) Strategic thinking is a combination of processes of insight and innovation The result is the integrated vision of the organization. The main objective of the research is to investigate the role of strategic thinking in promoting the combat capability of military organizations with an emphasis on the intangible factors of combat power (individual and organizational). Based on theoretical foundations, the conceptual model of the research is drawn up. The questions of the questionnaire were designed according to the factors and indicators of the conceptual model and after analyzing the sample population using the combination research method (pepticism and descriptive-analytical), it was analyzed. The statistical population is 110 people and the results of the research are applied. The results of this study indicate that there is a close relationship between strategic thinking and combat power. Conceptual thinking, system thinking, and futurism, which are elements of strategic thinking And vary in size on individual and organizational elements of combat power And as their strength increases, combat power is equally affected, Because strategic thinking focuses on the future direction with all its components and chooses the best option through different ways.

This study aims to review the causes of the future wars by means of Systems Thinking and develop a model which demonstrates the application of the former and modeling dynamic systems in such a way to analyse the causes behind the future wars. Doing so, it reviews 59 articles on future wars which have been published in foreign journals in the period between 1969 and 2013 upon content-analysis. The analysis of dynamic systems is a technique which provides the modeling of complex and non-linear systems. Furthermore, a dynamic model is applied to demonstrate the causative relations amongst recognized factors. Meanwhile, the outcome of the study reveals that change in balance of power, terrorism, uncertainty and security problems, shortage of resources, modern technologies, political problems and civil wars, border disputes, nationalism, religion, economic competition, globalization, material interests, prestige and honor in international scene, mass migration, population growth, animosity and climate changes play a key part in the foresight of future wars. It is worth noting this paper is the 1st study which by means of dynamic-system approach deals with the modeling of future wars.