Analyzing the ABU BASIR narrative in plurality of punishments if there is a repeated type of fornication (zina) with different women (analyzing the Articles 132 of the Islamic Penal Code

FOKAHA disagree about the sentence that requires fornicators to be subjected to a plurality of punishments if they are committed to repeat one type of fornication (zina) with different women. As with most consent FOKAHAS, there will be sufficient to enforce one punishment for a repeated fornication (zina) committed with different women. A few FOKAH, however, believe that a plurality of punishments should be served by those found guilty as they having had repeated fornication with different women. Taking into account all these comments mentioned above as well as analyzing them, the authors arrive at the conclusion that even though there is the consensus that there will be sufficient to enforce one punishment for a repeated type of fornication, it is of no documentary value due to the fact that there is a weak evidence to suggest the presumption of innocence, discounts, and mitigation as well as to ABU BASIR narrative according to believers’ claim of first quote. Thus, the important thing is to investigate if the reputation evidence is reliable. After reviewing the ABU BASIR narrative, it becomes clear that the second quote is thoroughly complete even confessed by the believers’ claim of first quote themselves. This narrative also cannot be considered to be poor evidence as well. Confirming the authenticity of this document as being thoroughly complete, there is no need to consider the presumption of innocence, discounts, and mitigation. As a result, there is no choice but to accept the second quote in this regard.