The Effect of a Governmental Culture on the Effectiveness of the Political System in the Islamic Republic of Iran

A brief definition of political culture refers to the attitude and insight of each individual towards the political system, political figures, and their functions and duties, as well as the attitude of political figures towards the role and position of the people in the political system. According to this definition, the total expectations of the people of the state institution and the total expectations of the people of the people in the form of this political culture is formed. This issue, of course, becomes more important in doubling the effectiveness of the effective political system as a military system that can accomplish tasks that most people are expected to accomplish and achieve the goals set out in these tasks for themselves. For this reason, as a glimpse of the features of Iranian political culture, it clarifies its statehood. The purpose of this research is to use a descriptive and analytical method to find the answer to the question: How does state-oriented culture affect the efficiency of the system? Have you got political in IRAN? In response to this question, the following hypothesis is tested: the state-run culture has been weakening the political system in the Islamic Republic of Iran by explaining various tasks in the political and economic arena for the government. The results of this study confirm the hypothesis that state-controlled culture has led to the continued passive participation and the weakening of political parties in the political arena and the formation of economic monopolies and, consequently, inflation, unemployment and the increase of economic corruption in the economy, which itself leads to the ineffectiveness of the political system. .