The effects of democracy on preventive criminal policy

Effects and Consequences, The democratic approach of criminal policy by using popular institutions and organizations, their participation in responding to social deviations and the power of the government to turn to crime; Accordingly, the determination of the normative scope and scope determined by the government narrows or expands the presence of civil society in the field of criminal policy; In a way, if the government expands the boundaries of normalcy and controlled space, the realm of normalcy and free space will be reduced, and civil society will play a lesser role in this regard, and as the controlled space of government degrades, the ability of citizens to maneuver and limit Government responses are increasing.

This article is written as a descriptive and analytical method.

The significant presence of citizens in the democratic model of criminal policy will also play an important role in increasing productivity and accelerating the implementation of legislative, executive and judicial criminal policy plans. The participatory approach focuses on the development of social strategies, which are themselves based on local needs, and seek to involve citizens and non-governmental organizations in prevention programs. Finally, this prevention has emerged following the idea that crime prevention without the help and participation of the people cannot have the desired result; Because crime is a social problem and it is the duty of every citizen to control it alongside the government. Therefore, the more and more tangible the participation of the people, the local community and non-governmental organizations, the greater the sustainability and success of prevention programs.