Legislative-structural challenges of the semi-liberal system in Iran

In this article, the legislative, executive and structural obstacles and challenges of the semi-liberty system will be discussed, and among them it can be said that the judicial culture among judges regarding semi-liberty has not yet taken the necessary form and public and social culture-building. Has not been and the centers and organizations of semi-freedom have not been established yet. The article also mentions the challenge of the necessity of pardoning a private plaintiff that even if there are conditions and the judge of the criminal court agrees, if the plaintiff does not pardon, he can not be sentenced to half freedom Legal enforcement guarantee in case of recidivism by a person enjoying a semi-liberty system. Regarding violations of the law, it is better to amend the law and need to explain more examples of semi-liberty, and in the absence of an executive guarantee, while amending the law, measures similar to those under parole should be adopted. Regarding structural challenges such as lack of financial context, it is necessary to consider some necessary financial resources, and regarding the lack of independent organization, it is necessary to create a special organization under the direct supervision of the judiciary. There is also ambiguity in the current laws regarding the role of the prosecutor and the execution judge, which requires an explicit text. In addition, training the agents of the criminal justice system by raising awareness can lead to the acceptance and better implementation of the semi-liberal method.