The Jurisprudential Rule of "Shin"

According to this rule, retaliation of a limb is for the "shain" (defect) that has occurred due to the crime, not merely the cutting and separation of the limb. "Shin" has not yet found its place as a jurisprudential rule. Therefore, the question of this research is to extract and establish the jurisprudential rule of Shin, as a fundamental rule in the chapter of retaliation of limbs. Based on the descriptive-analytical method, this paper presents the evidences of the rule (including the verse of Eteda, the narration of Ishaq Ibn Ammar, and consensus and also explains the characteristics of the rule such as the continuity of Shain, the actuality of Shain, and the similarity of Shin. Organizing the related titles in the form of a rule (based on the jurists methodology) will lead the towards a disciplined practice. Moreover, this rule is worth considering from the perspective of criminal philosophy and its affirmative and customary nature contributes to its validity, discipline, and regularity.