نشریه سیاست متعالیه
پیاپی 26 (پاییز 1398)

This project was aimed at analyzing Quran viewpoint towards the right of choose in the political freedom. Results indicated that Quran has recognized the right of choose for every individuals aiming at growth and superior selection. Besides, this is said that, this will happen through the practice of consulting, enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong, and criticism. This can be observed in the right of choosing, right of being chosen, and right of determining owns destiny. So that, individuals would be able to get free from socio-political barriers and imposed cruel power on their own. However human being has to follow divine orders.

This project is aimed at analyzing the mechanism of legal and political freedom guarantee for individuals from Quran's perspective. The findings of this study, which were carried out using the methodological approach of political interpretation of the Qur'an, suggest that based on reflection on the Qur'an and the following elements, freedom in society can be guaranteed from the Qur'an's perspective: Promoting science and awareness among the people, rationalism, thoughtfulness, conscious criticism, responsible emigration, sustainable dialogue between the people and the state with people. The above five components form a system that is inspired by the Qur'an and the needs of today's society and human experience gained through the theory of guaranteeing freedom.

This project was aimed at giving a new understanding of Imam Khomeini's political thoughts through an epistemological framework. The research method was descriptive-analytical. Results indicated that the political thoughts of Imam Khomeini confirmed his epistemological approach whether directly or indirectly. The two tools of reason and revelation have had the greatest impact on Imam Khomeini's political thought. His political thoughts, despite the significance of acquired knowledge, have been developed under the dominance of presential knowledge and more specifically through jurisprudence and theology. It is also said that many of his political approach could be consequence of epistemological assumption. Moreover, devoution is the highest level of knowledge to him.

This project is aimed at delivering a new interpretation of political thoughts of Sadra via discourse analysis and according to dominant atmosphere of his philosophical approach. With this regard the historical origin, basis and principle approaches of the discourse analysis and its application to Sadra philosophical approach have been studied. The research method was descriptive analytical. The results indicated that if philosophical approach of Sadra assumed to be discourse, so that Mosha' and Eshragh approaches can also be considered as Badil philosophical discourse. The identity of each discourse could be revised through articulation, central slab, and floating slab. In this way the relationship among different discourses throughout the history can be reinterpreted. Without adhering to the epistemological and relativistic foundations of discourse analysis, this theory can be useful in analyzing any phenomenon, culture, philosophy, or thought, but we should not turn subtexts and subtypes into idols that we cannot escape from their trap.

This project was aimed at analyzing the concept of Tabarri in the national movement and Islamic movement discourses. With this regard the interaction or opposition of Imam Khomeini and Mehdi Bazargan's approach toward arrogance through a discourse analysis method by lakla and Mophe have been discussed. Moreover, the concept of Tabarri as a major cause of divergence between the national movement and dominant thoughts of the Islamic movement was argued. Research demonstrated that the intellectual and behavioral gap which existed between two discourse subjects was rooted in discord of the central slab and floating slab of the discourses. The disagreement of the nature of their view towards different epistemic and behavioral aspects, with respect to political foundations of Shia and particularly Tabarri, rooted in the fundamental position of this concept in Khomeini's discourse. On the other side, Bazargan's discourse demonstrates a tendency towards west which could be seen in one side of central slab clearly.

This project was aimed at demonstrating the role of Islamic legal political system approach in eliminating conflicts of laws. With this regard a descriptive- analytical method has been employed to debate a series of contributing factors including political power in government's ideology, origins of political power and its association to legal basis, the significance of conflicts of laws to stability of soft power, laws conflict and the ratio of proposals, the guardianship of the Islamic jurist approach in solving conflict of laws, reasoning behind solving conflict of laws, and adapting jurisprudence approach for solving conflicts. The results indicate that basis of remedies for conflict of laws with respect to guardianship of the Islamic jurist principle either to religion logic, or from humanistic viewpoint equals the major factor. This is because of its reliance on human nature, so that it can compensate the absence of an international or a domestic written acceptable wise solution for the conflict of laws.

This project is aimed at demonstrating political principles of Jabal Amel School. Regarding this, it is assumed that Imamate and province are the dominant paradigm of the jurisprudence. Besides, Jabal Amel has the characteristics such as political necessity approach, respecting political powers of the jurist, and solving Shia's problems via adapting jurisprudence principle approach. In this project, historical origins of Jabal Amel, and political principles in association with Skiner contextualist theory were studied. Moreover, the political principles of Jabal Amel including the jurisprudence power, political approach to Safavids and the concept of religions unity were among discussed issues.

This project was aimed at estimating ratio associated with the theory of “ideal governing" alongside with the hidden capacity of Mohamad Hoseini Beheshti's political thoughts, besides estimating the possibility of “the idea of governing" as a practical approach which is compatible to Iranian community context. In this way, the theory of "nation and Imamate" from one side, and freedom factors, justice, organizational approach, besides some of Beheshti’s political thought were relied on. The main assumption of this research was that in political thoughts of Beheshti, the contributing factors to the theory of "the ideal governing" have an acceptable theoretical capacity to promote the idea of governing.

This project was aimed at analyzing political aspects of human security from Ja'fari jurisprudence versus international human rights. The research method was inferential. With this regard, primarily the issue in the context of security studies was briefly argued. Afterwards, three substantial norms and components including the right of being chosen, freedom of opinion and right of active political participation as the major aspects of the political security have been debated. The results show that both views differ on the principle of acceptance of "the right to exercise and express political opinion, the right to choose and the right to be elected" as the most important propositions in the political security of individuals and other societies of political rights and freedoms.

The major goal of this project was to explain the mechanism of providing economic security according to Quran and narrations. With this regard the associations of security with higher financial status and contributing factors to providing economic security have been argued throughout this research. The results indicate that – long back in the history- the complex concept of economic security and its mechanism was meticulously mentioned throughout the narrations and Quran. According to the research results not only it is possible to provide economic security via adapting such a practical guidance, but also the justice centered development and progression can be promoted around the Islamic human society under the dominance of monotheistic system.

A study of the secularist thoughts of freedom movements facing with Islamic Revolution's discourse with respect to Bazargan's Perspective In this regard, the components of secularism in Bazargan's thinking, including nationalism, opposition to the principle of Velayat-e Faqih, interpretation of religion based on liberalism, opposition to the establishment of religious government, opposition to the implementation of religious laws were examined. Moreover, facing Islam with thought of freedom movement was among debated issues. Results indicate that according to discourse analysis, nationalisms attached to the minimum role of religion are the basis of central freedom movement and this will lead to the political secularism. The nature of freedom movement is in contrast with Islamic revolution discourse. So that these two point of view would be classified as in total contradiction.

This project was aimed at identifying the political impacts of "antiapproximate" thoughts of Shia and Sunny scholars about Iranian community in Safavids era. The research method was descriptive_ analytical and based on Spriggens Crisis theory. The conflict model is demonstrated into three different areas including severe divergence (fighting in battle fields), medium divergence (cold war and Takfir Fatwa), and mild divergence (damn). During Safavids era behaviors were mostly associated with medium divergence (cold war). This approach is specifically observed among Shia and Sunny scholars' letters. The conflict between Safavids and Ottomans followed by detrimental consequences for Iranian community at the time. The rise of Sunnis against Safavids, the war between Uzbek and them, coalition of Uzbek and Ottomans against Shia, Armed conflicts and massacre, arresting and murdering Shia scholars, and keeping safe the Christian Europe are among those consequences.

The major goal of this project was to study the organization of military service and police forces in Amir Al-Mu'minin's (a.s) government, and to establish innovative nature of Shurtat Al-Khamis forces with a descriptive- analytical method. In this regard, the military organization in Kufa, the military history of Islam, creation of new military organizations by Amir al-Mu'menin (pbuh), the Shariah and the military in the Alawite state, the "Shurtat al-Khamis" as the most important military organization of Alawite government, the initiative by Imam Ali In forming the "Shurtat al-Khamis", time, place and members of the "Shurtat al-Khamis", the military activities of the members of the "Shurtat al-Khamis" and the Alawite government's military and police forces are examined. The results showed that there were three groups and population at the time of Imam Ali. A military group based on tribal organizations and two police groups. One was the "Shurtat al-Khamis" that the Prophet had created and had no record, and the other was a police group involved in various operations for security of the city. The term "Shurtat al-Khamis" is not mentioned in historical resources before and after Imam Ali (pbuh). Tabari and his Sunni scholars have called him the innovator of the "Shurtat al-Khamis" and the creator of a coherent body of police in Islam. Members of the "Shurtat al-Khamis" paid tribute to the security of cities and the fight against insurgents, corruptors, and invaders. During the war of Jamal and Saffin were also present.

The main goal of the present study was to demonstrate and adapt the concept of " the divine intelligent power" in Alawites doctrine, with respect to Nahj al-Balagha.
The research method was descriptive-analytical. Primarily, the concept of intelligent power under four different titles including leadership, hard power, soft power and integration ability has been demonstrated. After that, its realization in Alawites government via charisma, progress, emotional intelligence, environmental intelligence and social and political intelligence was debated.
Afterwards, the reason behind superiority of "Alawites intelligent power" according to four principles was argued. The principles include the superior power, leading nature of power, gracious viewpoint toward citizens, and denial of conceding in power.

This article is aimed at identifying political barriers in the way of cultural policy making in Iran. For this research a mixed successive discovery method is employed. The research community includes 369 cultural policy experts and elites. Besides, semi-systematic interviews as the first phase and 7 dimensional questionnaires based on collected data through open and axial coding method alongside with 40 testimonies as the second phase played the role of data collection tools. Results indicate that while among all recognized barriers the lack of integrated management system scored the both higher average and higher rating average, the impact portion of such obstacle according to the linear model perspective tends to remain the least. Moreover, the political support factor represents a more serious obstacle to achieving cultural policy making in Islamic republic of Iran. Meanwhile, the community tendency to resistance can predict the cultural policy making achievements in Iran.